(click thumbnail)Reading the recent World Trade Center remembrances from my colleague on these pages, Peter Prunty, brought to mind my own memories of One World Trade Center – the North Tower. Many who have worked in television in New York have spent time at the Trade Center and your writer is one of those, having been involved in early experimentation with –and implementation of – the BTSC TV multichannel sound system at the flagship station of another network (hint: feathers).
That station went on the air from the World Trade Center in the latter half of 1983, the last station to make the move from the Empire State Building. The move happily coincided with the desire to experiment with that new technology: BTSC multichannel television sound.
The station's Empire State Building transmitters were too old to optimally broadcast multichannnel sound. Its incidental carrier phase modulation (ICPM) specification – a parameter that was little known or regarded before the TV multichannel sound era dawned – was too high.
The World Trade Center installation featured two brand-new pairs of RCA G-line low-band VHF transmitters and – although there was, as yet, no interface for wideband BTSC signals on their exciters – the transmitters were ready for BTSC with respect to performance parameters.
There was some ongoing dispute with RCA over warranties, so your writer was not permitted to so much as drill a hole in a chassis, let alone add a wideband input to one of the G-line aural exciters to add multichannel signals to the aural carrier. We were, however, permitted to plug an FM radio exciter that we had on-hand into the transmitters.
The FM broadcast band is 88-108 MHz; the aural IF frequency of the transmitter was 41.25 MHz. The exercise of adapting the exciter to run at about half its lowest design frequency was a real challenge. A custom crystal had to be ground, of course, but a number of other components had to be changed as well.
It was relatively easy to persuade the frequency-modulated oscillator to idle at the 41.25 MHz center frequency with a few component changes, but the crystal-reference oscillator absolutely refused to run with the custom crystal!
The solution was to tack in another – very simple – crystal oscillator built around a single transistor. This worked nicely. The exciter's modified output filter – with its complement of capacitor/resistor network – was a mess to gaze upon when its modifications were complete, but it made the signal legal!
In addition to the FM exciter, an FM stereo encoder was modified – the crystal in its 19 kHz oscillator was replaced with a function generator that was locked to horizontal sync. This made the encoder generate a pilot and stereo subcarrier at the appropriate frequencies. The encoder was of the "switching" type, which afforded no direct access to the L+R and L-R sum and difference signals themselves.
The BTSC system required the difference signal to be doubled in amplitude for transmission to improve its signal-to-noise ratio. Further, the difference signal had to pass through a rather sophisticated, sharp cutoff filter to protect the pilot. In order to preserve stereo separation, the sum signal had to be passed through an identical filter.
All this conditioning was applied using an external box that matrixed left and right channel signals into sum and difference signals, doubled the amplitude of the difference signal, passed the signals through a pair of appropriate filters, de-matrixed the result into left and right channels again and, finally, passed them along to the stereo encoder itself.
A second audio program (SAP) encoder was made from a modified FM subcarrier generator whose reference oscillator was also locked to horizontal sync using a function generator; a professional channel generator was made from yet another FM subcarrier generator. Amazingly enough, all this homemade stuff worked (can you imagine that in the digital age?) and the stereo separation that was achieved was really quite respectable.
WAIT YOUR TURN
A request for special temporary authority to test this TV stereo system on the air was made in 1983 – before the BTSC system was officially approved – but the FCC required us to wait until its rulemaking was issued. When this happened in early 1984, we were ready to begin on-air experimentation.
Commercial BTSC encoders were not available until early 1985 – the homemade system was used to generate all the transmitted audio signals of a major television station in the country's biggest market for a period of about one year. It only took a few months for your author to stop waking up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat, worrying about failures!
In addition to ongoing experimentation, it was used to broadcast the first real commercial program with BTSC stereo in the summer of 1984 (a story in its own right) and one or two other special programs, as well as all the station's regular audio programming. Unless someone threw it out at some point, all that hardware used in the experimental BTSC system got crushed in the rubble on Sept. 11, along with the transmitters themselves.
During the course of the year that the experimental BTSC stereo system was on the air – as well as the period preceding that when dummy-load testing was done – your writer spent at least one overnight a week on the 104th floor of One World Trade Center. This was frequently supplemented by trips to the World Trade Center during the day. It was an inspiring experience to watch the sun come up over the Brooklyn Bridge and the East River far below – an experience that was repeated many times.
Thoughts of that very interesting period, somewhat forgotten over the intervening years, have arisen many times since Sept. 11. It deepened friendships with a number of TV engineers who played parts in the ongoing story – and particularly with Bill Steckman, an engineer who was lost on that horrible day.
In recent years, my travels seldom took me to the World Trade Center. It did happen, however, that on Aug. 10 – just a month before that tragic day – I took the subway to World Trade Center where I boarded a water taxi to a marina in New Jersey, and returned at the end of the day.
As I walked through the lobby of One World Trade Center and through the rest of the complex, over the West Side Highway and through the lobby of the World Financial Center to the boat, I thought about the fact that it had been a long time since I had, with regularity, walked through the Trade Center complex.
Little did I then know that it would be the last time I would do so. I have not returned to the World Trade Center area since, because somehow I can't bear the thought of seeing it in its present state. I will never forget.
Shroud or No Shroud Decision Could Impact One World Trade Center's Tallest Tower Status
The fate of One World Trade Center's claim to tallest tower in the U.S. once it is completed could be challenged if the 408 foot antenna spire at the top is not enclosed in an ornamental white shell.