<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
    <channel>
                    <atom:link href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/feeds/tag/2016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                            <title><![CDATA[ Latest from Tv Technology in 2016 ]]></title>
                <link>https://www.tvtechnology.com/tag/2016</link>
        <description><![CDATA[ All the latest 2016 content from the Tv Technology team ]]></description>
                                    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                            <language>en</language>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ TV Tech's Top 10 Stories of 2016 ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/tv-techs-top-10-stories-of-2016</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ The final days of 2016 at here, so it’s time to look back and see what made the year what it was. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">optvhr1hTuMjrLqnHoTjoF</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mqfKK8h2GVcXgtvV6UbXCJ-1280-80.png" type="image/png" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Michael Balderston ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/png" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mqfKK8h2GVcXgtvV6UbXCJ-1280-80.png">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mqfKK8h2GVcXgtvV6UbXCJ-1280-80.png" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p><strong>ARLINGTON, VA.—</strong>The final days of 2016 at here, so it’s time to look back and see what made the year what it was. TV Technology covered stories on the emergence of 4K/UHD and other future tech like virtual reality; the build-up and results of the spectrum auction; and even a first for one of TV’s longest running shows. At the end of the day though, these were the most popular stories from TV Technology in 2016:</p><p>10. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/the-lipsync-problem-that-wont-go-away" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/0004/the-lipsync-problem-that-wont-go-away/279183">The Lip-Sync Problem That Won’t Go Away!</a><br/>Aug. 8 - So we’ve all been there, watching a TV show and the actor’s lips are moving but the words are just not coming out at the right time.</p><p>9. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/coming-soon-atsc-30" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/resources/0006/coming-soon-atsc-30/278850">Coming Soon: ATSC 3.0!</a><br/>June 22 - A successful plug-fest in Baltimore, an impressive display of ATSC 3.0 technology at the NAB Show in Las Vegas, an FCC Public Notice requesting comment on a widely supported request to allow broadcasters’ use of ATSC 3.0, and a packed 2016 ATSC Broadcast Television Conference-“Countdown to Launch” in Washington, D.C. in May indicates ATSC 3.0 may soon be coming to a TV or tablet near you!</p><p>8. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/diversified-acquires-technical-innovation" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/business/0011/diversified-acquires-technical-innovation/277895">Diversified Acquires Technical Innovation</a></p><p>Feb. 9 - Systems integrator Diversified today announced the acquisition of Atlanta-based Technical Innovation.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="mqfKK8h2GVcXgtvV6UbXCJ" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mqfKK8h2GVcXgtvV6UbXCJ.png" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/mqfKK8h2GVcXgtvV6UbXCJ.png" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p>7. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/simpsons-prepare-for-animations-first-live-broadcast" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/0002/simpsons-prepare-for-animations-first-live-broadcast/278589">‘Simpsons’ Prepare for Animations First Live Broadcast</a></p><p>May 3 - In the 25 years that “The Simpsons” has been on the air, there isn’t much that the show hasn’t done. </p><p>6. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/126-mhz-cleared-at-86-billion" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/0002/126-mhz-cleared-at-86-billion/278926">126 MHz Cleared at $86 Billion</a></p><p>June 29 - The first reverse stage of the TV spectrum incentive auction has concluded, with a clearing cost of $86,422,558,704. </p><p>5. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/fcc-releases-incentive-auction-clearing-target" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/0002/fcc-releases-incentive-auction-clearing-target/278576">FCC Releases 126 MHz Clearing Target</a></p><p>April 29 - The Federal Communications Commission today released its clearing target for the TV spectrum incentive auction. </p><p>4. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/stations-prep-for-national-eas-test" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/broadcast-engineering/0029/stations-prep-for-national-eas-test/279368">Stations Prep for National EAS Test</a></p><p>Sept. 8 - If ever the broadcast industry was poised and ready for a test, it seems to be this one. </p><p>3. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/tv-technology-announces-2016-nab-best-of-show-award-winners" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/awards/0028/tv-technology-announces-2016-nab-best-of-show-award-winners/278530">TV Technology Announces 2016 NAB Best of Show Award Winners</a></p><p>April 25 - <em>TV Technology</em> has announced the Best of Show Award winners for the 2016 NAB Show. </p><p>2. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/videooverip-aim-aspen-compared" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/0004/videooverip-aim-aspen-compared/277733">Video-Over-IP: AIM, ASPEN Compared</a><br/>Jan. 12 - As 2015 was wrapping up, new developments in IP transport of live uncompressed (or mezzanine compressed) video have compelled me to continue on with this theme of video-over-IP.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="PRt8sF4X2bAXZskz76rJaA" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PRt8sF4X2bAXZskz76rJaA.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/PRt8sF4X2bAXZskz76rJaA.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p>1. <a href="https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/vizio-make-atsc-tunerfree-4ktvs" data-original-url="http://www.tvtechnology.com/news/0002/vizio-make-atsc-tunerfree-4ktvs/278312">Vizio Makes ATSC Tuner Free 4KTVs</a></p><p>April 4 - Vizio is rolling out a new line of smart 4KTVs that aren’t. </p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ McAdams On: 2016 ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/mcadams-on-2016</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ That was fast. Here we are with 2016 in the rearview. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">46iibySyRCcGFtyPgrBu8d</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Dj78z4bB6qZJeonazqp8Q-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
                                                                                                                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Deborah D McAdams ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                                        <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Dj78z4bB6qZJeonazqp8Q-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Dj78z4bB6qZJeonazqp8Q-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p>That was fast. Here we are with 2016 in the rearview. I believe I speak for myself when I say, what in the blazes just happened?</p><p>Well, in January, amid the retina-frying sea of colossal TV screens that is the annual Consumer Gadget Extravaganza, Kodak inexplicably resurrected Super 8. Everyone got really excited and promptly forgot about it.</p><p>In February, Beyoncé led a march on the Super Bowl, leading NFL officials to seek a less controversial performer for the 2017 event in the form of a woman known to wear carpaccio. Meanwhile, Korea said it would launch ATSC 3.0 broadcasting in 2017 as the U.S. prepared to auction off public airwaves.</p><p>Drone sightings near airports escalated in March to the point where the Federal Aviation Administration sent out a stern press release.</p><p>In April, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said he’d circulate a petition for voluntary adoption of ATSC 3.0; then did so, and promptly forgot about it.</p><p>In May, Homer Simpson took questions from a live audience and told a woman who wanted to do nothing at work to “always wear glasses with eyes glued onto them.”</p><p>In June, broadcasters ask $86 billion for 126 MHz of TV spectrum.</p><p>South Korea adopted ATSC 3.0 in July, while 62 bidders lined up to buy $86 billion worth of TV spectrum in the United States.</p><p>In August, bidding stopped at $22.45 billion.</p><p>In September, the first broadcast antennas were installed on One World Trade Center. People never forgot and continue to care.</p><p>In October, broadcasters asked $54.6 million for 114 MHz that subsequently raised $21.5 billion after a single, two-hour round of bidding.</p><p>In November, teen-age Macedonian entrepreneurs created the fake news industry while some guys at MIT wrote an algorithm that makes videos from still shots.</p><p>In December, broadcasters asked $40.3 billion for 108 MHz because of a “spectrum crisis” everyone got excited about and promptly forgot.</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
                                <item>
                                                            <title><![CDATA[ 2016: A ‘Huuuuge’ Year ]]></title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>https://www.tvtechnology.com/opinions/2016-a-huuuuge-year</link>
                                                                            <description>
                            <![CDATA[ It’s that time again… to look back at the past year and forward to a new year. ]]>
                                                                                                            </description>
                                                                                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">7FtSX8W5MzQcsWdJ9DX2bD</guid>
                                                                                                <enclosure url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Dj78z4bB6qZJeonazqp8Q-1280-80.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="0"></enclosure>
                                                                        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
                                                                                                <author><![CDATA[ tom.butts@futurenet.com (Tom Butts) ]]></author>                    <dc:creator><![CDATA[ Tom Butts ]]></dc:creator>                                                                                    <dc:source><![CDATA[ http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/Ym75XZxKuaGiZGj7nMGeGM.jpg ]]></dc:source>
                                                                <dc:description><![CDATA[ null ]]></dc:description>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Dj78z4bB6qZJeonazqp8Q-1280-80.jpg">
                                                            <media:credit><![CDATA[null]]></media:credit>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    </media:content>
                                                    <media:thumbnail url="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2Dj78z4bB6qZJeonazqp8Q-1280-80.jpg" />
                                                                                                                                                                    <content:encoded >
                            <![CDATA[
                            <article>
                                <p><em>It’s that time again… to look back at the past year and forward to a new year. The pace of change is accelerating every year and 2016 saw numerous milestones for the broadcast industry. To help make sense of it all, we asked some of our feature writers to offer their thoughts.</em></p><p><em>Happy holidays from TV Technology!</em></p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="2vCZfKNKtTQNGeJ5FUC7Rb" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2vCZfKNKtTQNGeJ5FUC7Rb.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/2vCZfKNKtTQNGeJ5FUC7Rb.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p><strong>CHARLIE RHODES,</strong><strong><em>Digital TV</em></strong><br/>Perhaps the future of over-the-air terrestrial VT broadcasting will be determined by the outcome of the series of spectrum auctions being conducted by the FCC. To date, the FCC has held 3 of these, starting with 126 MHz of spectrum on the block. It failed. Then a second auction with 114 MHz of our spectrum was held and it too failed. So the FCC conducted a third auction with only 108 MHz available and it too has failed. The next auction with only 84 MHz on the block will start soon. It is beginning to appear that our 600 MHz Band is no longer as desirable as it was when these auctions were planned.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="hK7FQueYLevGS5sF7SSa3Q" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hK7FQueYLevGS5sF7SSa3Q.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/hK7FQueYLevGS5sF7SSa3Q.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p><strong>AL KOVALICK,</strong><strong><em>Cloudspotters Journal</em></strong><br/>The migration to all things IT, Ethernet/IP and cloud continues. SMPTE’s effort to standardize the transport of A/V over IP is making good progress. Many vendors “see the light” and are offering software products that run in the public and private clouds. SaaS is growing at an annual growth rate of 27 percent and the transition to cloud-based apps for the media enterprise is in full swing.</p><p>This year marked a turning point for cloud acceptance by media companies. Cloud services are now considered by many as more secure than many enterprise systems. Savvy technical staff are bulking up for the future and learning all they can about this new world that will transform our media infrastructure and culture.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="i6AaPjc7KawQXE39VjGhhG" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/i6AaPjc7KawQXE39VjGhhG.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/i6AaPjc7KawQXE39VjGhhG.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p><strong>GARY ARLEN,</strong><strong><em>Multiscreen Views</em></strong><br/>Video carriage on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Snap, Instagram and other social media platforms—which expanded broadly in 2016—underscored the massive rearrangement of the video distribution business. Along with MVPD’s skinny bundles and programmers’ moves (HBOGo, Starz streams on DirecTV Now and others) to sell directly to viewers, new audiences are learning to watch video-on-demand as they like it. Add in content marketing and other non-traditional video productions, and the viewing fragmentation is pervasive. Equally important, advertisers are moving budgets to new video platforms.</p><p>On the technology front, the assault of virtual and augmented reality was big and will get much larger. Pokémon GO may have been a summer fad, but its implications for future immersive media ventures are very “real.”</p><p>In the world of policy and regulatory issues, 2017 is a “yuuuuge” question mark. With all the bluster about net neutrality, spectrum decisions, privacy and cybersecurity plus ATSC 3.0 approval, there is no clear direction yet for how the new administration, Congress, agencies and courts will deal with media/telecom conundrums.</p><p>There are just so many alternatives.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="3GFjtdSLSprpNoKJGbzQN6" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3GFjtdSLSprpNoKJGbzQN6.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3GFjtdSLSprpNoKJGbzQN6.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p><strong>JAY ANKENEY,</strong><strong><em>Focus on Editing</em></strong><br/>It’s been a pivotal year for editing and post production. But how has 2016 affected the evolving role of the “editor?”</p><p>Print-trained journalists now edit news packages on iPhones, and there’s a super computer at IBM named Watson cutting promos for feature films.</p><p>Meanwhile primetime pro editors are handling projects shot in HDR, although you’ll best see them on streaming sites mostly known for cat videos. OTA broadcasters won’t catch up until the advent of ATSC 3.0 whose charge to inevitability has subtly gained the tag “voluntary” over the past annum.</p><p>Meanwhile, virtual reality projects are groping like pre-Griffith pioneers to develop the grammar of VR’s narrative communication.</p><p>On the horizon is light field technology which brings the whole production into the edit bay by capturing the entire volumetric visual information of a scene on multiple imaging arrays.</p><p>Are today’s editors stars of post or ringmasters of technological transformation?</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="zdcUQgF743aJydq7NsoXRh" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zdcUQgF743aJydq7NsoXRh.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/zdcUQgF743aJydq7NsoXRh.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p><strong>JAY YEARY,</strong><strong><em>Inside Audio</em></strong><br/>The many versions of immersive audio seemed to dominate the audio landscape in 2016, with format decisions now made for Next Generation Audio, and as personalized 3D audio has come into its own as the technology that makes VR truly immersive. This year we should expect to see standard workflows emerge as immersive audio production gradually increases.</p><p>Audio-over-IP technology adoption continued this past year but it should exhibit a greater presence in broadcast in 2017 as AES67 is embraced by major standards organizations as their audio streaming technology of choice, leading to its inclusion in SMPTE-2110. Most important of all, hopefully 2017 will be the year that OTT and streaming providers finally embrace loudness management for the content they deliver.</p><figure class="van-image-figure pull-" data-bordeaux-image-check ><div class='image-full-width-wrapper'><div class='image-widthsetter' ><p class="vanilla-image-block" style="padding-top:56.25%;"><img id="tdvbTNWvkRk7xgr5sUivQb" name="" alt="" src="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/tdvbTNWvkRk7xgr5sUivQb.jpg" mos="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/tdvbTNWvkRk7xgr5sUivQb.jpg" align="" fullscreen="" width="" height="" attribution="" endorsement="" class="pull-"></p></div></div></figure><p><strong>DOUG LUNG,</strong><strong><em>RF Technology</em></strong><br/>For 2016 the biggest development for broadcasters was the near completion of the ATSC 3.0 standard and it is complicated! Also significant for this past year was the time and effort manufacturers and broadcasters are putting into developing new products for the repack. Many questions remain on what stations will be left, and what the FCC will pay for.</p><p>Will broadcasters embrace ATSC 3.0 in 2017? Perhaps it’s too soon to tell, but equipment choices and announcements post NAB could provide some clues.</p><p>What’s the future of broadcast TV if they don’t? The impact of the repack? How can the limited number of RF and structural engineers meet the tight CP filing deadlines after the auction closes? As groups scramble to move stations to new channels, will other projects suffer?</p><p>After all of this preparation, what happens if the auction fails?</p>
                                                            </article>
                            ]]>
                        </content:encoded>
                                                </item>
            </channel>
</rss>