LightSquared filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling with the FCC stating "unlicensed commercial GPS receivers are simply not entitled to interference protection from LightSquared's licensed operations in the MSS band."
LightSquared asked the FCC to declare that commercial GPS receivers "have no independent right to 'protection' from operations in adjacent MSS bands, independent of the license conditions that limit the out-of-band power that may be emitted by MSS band transmitters into the RNSS band, and other than the benefit afforded by the guard band that should separate LightSquared's terrestrial operations in the MSS band from commercial GPS operations in the RNSS band."
LightSquared also asked the FCC to declare, "The costs of ensuring that GPS devices are compatible with adjacent band operations--including any costs necessary to retrofit legacy devices--are the responsibility of GPS manufacturers--or, at a minimum, are not the obligation of MSS/ATC licensees."
The Petition for Declaratory Ruling focuses on commercial devices, although the last request would not exclude consumer GPS devices.
Jeff Carlisle, LightSquared's executive VP for regulatory affairs and public policy, commented, "The one inescapable conclusion from two rounds of independent testing is that the incompatibility problem is not caused by LightSquared's network. It is clear that GPS devices are purposefully designed to look into LightSquared's licensed spectrum, and given this evidence, we believe decision-makers should consider LightSquared's legal rights as the licensee."
The Coalition to Save Our GPS disagrees. See The Year in Review: As Proof of Harmful Interference Mounts, LightSquared Continues to Ignore the Facts.
Jim Kirkland, VP and General Counsel at Trimble said, "As we stated last night in response to LightSquared's most recent filing with the FCC, LightSquared continues to recycle the litany of inaccurate and self-serving claims it has made in its ongoing effort to deny its obligation to avoid harmful interference to millions of government and private GPS users. LightSquared continually minimizes or denies the GPS interference problem caused by its planned network, and its claims have been proven wrong again and again by overwhelming technical evidence."
Even if the FCC would agree with LightSquared's Petition, it isn't clear Congress would allow LightSquared to use its spectrum adjacent to the GPS band for terrestrial operations. The Forbes article Lightscrewed: How Washington Whipped Phil Falcone describes the politics around the controversy.
Kevin Fitchard writes on Gigaom.com Without FCC approval, bankruptcy looms for LightSquared. He says, "If LightSquared can't get more cash, it may look to sell off its primary asset, its spectrum, but it's doubtful it could get a good price for those airwaves given the cloud that currently hangs over them. If it were to get FCC approval to launch a terrestrial LTE network, those L-band licenses would be worth billions, but if it fails to win that approval, the spectrum could only be used for satellite services, which would slash their value immensely."
LightSquared asks FCC to confirm its rights as spectrum licensee
The company claims that commercial GPS manufacturers are responsible for having designed and sold unlicensed devices that use spectrum licensed to LightSquared.The company claims that commercial GPS manufacturers are responsible for having designed and sold unlicensed devices that use spectrum licensed to LightSquared.