WASHINGTON— Broadcasters have enjoyed
free and unfettered use of several
microwave transmission bands for decades.
These Broadcast Auxiliary Service
bands at 2, 7 and 13 GHz are used by TV
stations for electronic newsgathering, station
to transmitter links and inter-city relays.
Since they came into use in the 1960s,
these channels were pretty much the exclusive
domain of broadcast television. Not
anymore.
With increasing demand for
wireless devices by consumers, the
telco industry has been lobbying for more spectrum for wireless services. In
the United States, the FCC has been working
to accommodate the needs of the wireless
industry, and with rulings from Docket
10-153, they have started what many call the
“BAS flexibility rule.” Dane Ericksen, senior
engineer at Hammett & Edison, a San Francisco-based company that specializes in helping
stations with RF and FCC compliance
issues, says broadcasters should be cautious.
“Whenever the commission comes out
with the term ‘flexibility’ in their rulemaking,
stations better hold onto their spectrum wallets,
as it is rarely good news for the incumbent
licensees,” Ericksen said. The new ruling
specifically opens up the 7 and 13 GHz BAS
spectrum to fixed service providers who
want to use the spectrum for point-to-point
business microwave backhauls to cell sites.
The commission states that they can let
the telco operators into BAS bands if they
are careful about it. Many in the broadcast
RF field agree that it can be done with
proper coordination, but they all warn of
major issues arising if stations don’t have all
their links properly registered with current
information in the FCC’s Universal Licensing
System.
WHERE ARE THE RECORDS?
The greatest issue for broadcasters is
that a large percentage of the records for
their fixed link BAS channels may have
missing receive end data. Ericksen estimates
that 20 percent of 7 GHz links and
nearly 30 percent of 13 GHz have improper
documentation, or no documentation at all.
How did this happen and why does it matter?
Broadcasters should listen closely to
the answers to these questions.
The problem arose due to a legacy issue
with the forms that the FCC originally used
to register fixed microwave links. “Prior to
1983, versions of FCC form 313 [application
for authorization in the auxiliary radio broadcast
services] didn’t have a place to report
the receive-end dish’s coordinates, make and
model, or even the dish height,” Ericksen
said. “This means that decades worth of links
were recorded without little to any information
about one end of their link! After 1983,
form 313 was replaced by common form
601, which became the primary information
submittal document for a station’s links for
the Universal Licensing System. The ULS is
now the master database for all wireless frequency
registration. All the original form 313
records with missing receive end data got
transferred over to the ULS system.”
Even though public notices were sent out
to broadcasters requesting that they update
this data, companies like Hammett & Edison
discovered that many stations found the new
form too hard to navigate and therefore they
didn’t spend the time to update all their links.
In a given market, most stations have a
good idea of where the other stations’ dishes
and links are located, whether they be STLs,
transmitter-studio link or IRCs. There is
a professional courtesy among broadcasters
in which stations communicate with one another
and work out any interference issues
among themselves. This is where a new issue
arises; fixed service providers now entering
a market have no familiarity with the local
BAS paths and therefore will only be going
by the information listed in the ULS.
 |
|
An RF test crew from Vislink conduct a survey at a microwave receive site. |
“Broadcasters should be reviewing all
their paperwork,” said Joseph Giardina, chief technology officer and CEO of New York-based microwave
systems company, DSI RF Systems. “They
should be going to the ULS database and
checking their STL, TSL and inter-city relays.
It’s the station’s responsibility, no one else’s.”
DSI sells and installs microwave links
nationwide and is familiar with making
sure new sites are set up properly and registered
in the ULS. “You don’t find out until
an offending party spends $100K to put in a
DS-3 link, and when they fire it up, it causes
interference because you didn’t do your
paperwork,” Giardina said. Even though the
broadcasters may be the primary user in
this case, rest assured that the telco will file
a lawsuit to recoup their costs.
Christopher Gibbons, vice president
of Vislink, a U.K.-based microwave and
RF systems company, explains that when
a reputable RF systems integrator puts in
a new path, many safeguards are put into
the process. “We start with a proper overall
physical survey that includes site visits, line of-
sight verifications and complete RF systems
testing,” Gibbons said. There is a good
chance a station’s legacy deployments may
have been done in-house and not had today’s
resources to test and document.
The FCC provides protection for fixed
links from interference, but if nobody knows
that you are there, the required common
carrier notification protection won’t do you
any good. Both Ericksen and
Giardina point to the changing
roles of chief engineers
over the years as a reason so
many records may be out of
date. There was a time when
a CE had an assistant CE, a
transmitter engineer, office
staff and often a legal firm
that helped keep the station’s
licenses and records
up to date. Today, a new CE
may find himself in charge of
several stations with less staff,
fewer resources and without
the legacy knowledge of the previously tenured
CE.
“How are they going to maintain all
the equipment and still find the time to effectively
search and update the database without
hiring a firm like Comsearch to help
out?” Giardina said.
Like Hammett & Edison,
Ashburn, Va.-based Comsearch can help a
station by providing not only FCC database
research, but also evaluation of the station’s
link data to make sure that it is current.
Along with missing data about the receive
antenna itself, most map coordinates of
dishes were originally done with topographical
maps rather than modern global positioning systems. There is a
chance those previous estimations are not as
precise as they need to be in a newer, more
crowded microwave user landscape.
POTENTIAL FOR INTERFERENCE
In addition to record-keeping, interference
issues are also expected to be a cause for
concern in this new spectrum environment.
BAS spectrum is “no longer a broadcaster-only band,” Ericksen said.
Telcos currently
use the 6, 11 and 18 GHz bands for their
cellular tower backhauls. Where broadcasters
once had exclusive use of the 2, 7 and
13 GHz bands, they now will have to coexist
with the telcos as they move from their
filled bands and into broadcasters.
“As cell
companies begin to proliferate the band for
more backhaul needs, this could become
an issue,” Giardina said. Just as they
filled up the bands they previously used,
they may overcrowd the BAS bands as well.
“This isn’t like the analog to digital transition,” said Jay Adrick, vice president of
Broadcast Technologies at Harris Broadcast.
“In this case there is no alternative spectrum.”
Adrick has seen the same issues arise
overseas where wireless operators are constantly
looking for more spectrum to expand
their services.
Both the lower frequency 2 GHz band and
the higher 7–13 GHz bands face different
challenges. “2 GHz is a very important band
to broadcasters,” Adrick said. Where higher
frequencies like 13 GHz may be good for
only 25 miles, the 2 GHz signals can travel
hundreds of miles with less susceptibility of
rain fade. For this reason the 2 GHz bands are
popular for ENG and inter-city relay links. At
the request of the SBE, “this part of the 2 GHz
band was added to the TV pickup license for
ENG use,” Ericksen said, who estimates that
half of all TV pickup licenses have added
their fixed ENG sites to that license. This
means that those sites are protected.
Protection means recourse if a telco
fires up their equipment unknowingly in
the path of, or adjacent to, existing broadcast
equipment and causes interference.
They will be required to adjust their signal,
provide filters for the broadcaster, or vacate
the channel entirely. There are several
scenarios where a newcomer can step on
another’s channel, if inaccurate receive coordinates
were filed for an STL and a new
telco transmitter is placed too close and
overrides the intended receive signal to a
path that wasn’t originally engineered to
deal with more crowded spectrum.
“I have not heard from our clients on
any interference yet in STL bands,” DSI’s Giardina said. “If the installation was done
correctly and engineered with a certain factor
of resilience there should be no interference.”
Giardina also explained that unless
corners are cut on the installation or if there
is a ULS issue, STL and relay links should not
experience interference. He always recommends
going with a larger dish and even a
shroud or notch filter in high RF environments
to reduce the chance of a compromised
signal.
On the higher frequencies, a high-performance
shrouded antenna may be a
requirement, even though the newer IP-based
microwave radios used in broadcast
can often avoid interference by just switching
channels. The fact that telco backhauls
are high bandwidth bidirectional data
feeds in a formerly unidirectional band
may cause issues as more of these stations
appear and possibly create frequency congestion.
“We recommend an 8-foot antenna on
both 7 and 13 GHz paths,” said Vislink’s
Gibbons, who also recommended that
broadcasters pay attention to those Prior
Coordination Notification notices
they get from frequency coordinators.
Comparing the notices against their existing
infrastructure and keeping them on file
can help prevent issues from arising and
troubleshoot them when and if they occur.
PLAYING THE ODDS
Some broadcasters look at telcos as “trespassing”
on their band, but as Giardina said,
“the reality is most telco links will
take up only a small portion of the spectrum
in any one area. This same channel can be
used elsewhere in a different direction that
won’t cause interference with the first one
or others. What are the odds of someone being
on axis +/–5 degrees to be able to interfere
with you?” With the ability to use point
radius information from the ULS database to
search the radiation patterns, modern tools
make it easier than ever to ensure a station’s
vital links are protected.
Vislink’s Gibbons agrees. “The carrier
typically doesn’t use higher elevation or
common locations used by broadcasters,” he
said. This tendency to be located at lower elevations
does provide significant separation
from paths broadcasters typically use for
ENG and STLs.
The fact is that the telcos don’t want to
waste money on a link that can’t or won’t
work, so if the built-in safeguards do work,
there should be minimal issues. A station
that does not properly maintain their links
in the ULS can spend more in legal fees fighting
lawsuits than simply correcting database
errors. To make sure that the safeguards protect
the station’s valuable spectrum assignments,
a station either has to put in the effort
necessary to confirm all their records are up
to date on the ULS, or go with a reputable
firm whose tight criteria and modern tools
will guarantee the links will be protected.