 |
| MARY GRUSZKA |
As audio systems
designers, much
of our work involves
generating cable
run sheets, looking up
connector pinout information,
and generally
making sure that one
piece of gear can physically
connect to another.
With multi-pin connectors especially,
we often find different manufacturers’ pinout
strategies differ from one another, even
with the same style of connector.
So it was encouraging to see that the Audio
Engineering Society has tackled
the pinout standardization of one of the
more common multi-pin connectors used
for audio, the D25 25-pin subminiature Dconnector.
The standard is AES59-2012, “AES standard
for professional audio - Audio application
of 25-way D-type connectors in balanced
circuits,” published August 18, 2012.
“Over the past several decades, there
have been many interesting, yet incompatible,
ways to use the widely available
25-way D-type connector in audio applications,”
said Mark Yonge, AES Standards manager. “This standard was instigated by
Steve Drummond of SSL who felt that a
single standard specifically for balanced
audio circuits—both analog and AES3 digital—
would save everyone a lot of time and
effort by making specialized interconnections
and patch cables unnecessary.”
Steve Drummond, technology development
manager of Solid State Logic, added, “It
was originally inspired by an email conversation
four years ago with Graham Hinton
of Hinton Instruments complaining about
the difficulty of connecting one of our
pieces of equipment to another manufacturer’s.”
PINOUT ASSIGNMENTS
Among its provisions, this standard
provides the pinout assignments for eight
pairs of analog or digital (AES3) audio circuits
in one D25. This is listed in Table 1,
and an illustration of the physical layout is
shown in Fig. 1.
 |
|
Table 1: 25-contact subminiature (D-SUB) connector assignment for balanced audio per AES59-2012—Inputs or outputs, analog or digital (analog and digital not mixed, analog inputs and outputs not mixed, see Fig. 1 for mixed digital inputs and outputs). Chassis connector is DB25F (female), cable connector is DB25M (male).
NOTE 1 While this contact arrangement will be satisfactory for either analogue or digital signals, practical performance with digital signals may depend on using an appropriate cable type. See AES3-4-2009 and AES-2id.
NOTE 2 AES3 digital interconnections are not polarity sensitive. However, maintaining consistent polarity in all connectors permits digital cables to be used with analogue circuits if the need arises.
|
“The pinout was based on one of the
two defacto ‘standards’ that were and are
in use—the pinout that Tascam used for the
analog connections on the DA-88 recorder,”
Drummond said. “Unlike the other common
pinout based on the Yamaha I/O cards, [the
Tascam] has a separate shield connection
for each signal and is laid out with each
channel on adjacent pins, making it easier
to terminate. A number of manufacturers
were already using the ‘Tascam’ pinout.”
According to the standard, a single D-25
connector can be used for eight analog inputs
or outputs, or eight digital inputs or
outputs, but not mixed analog and digital,
nor mixed analog inputs and outputs.
“Mixing analog and digital signals would
risk, and probably guarantee, cross talk
from the digital to analog signals,” Drummond
said.
The standard does provide a pin-out for
a mix of four digital inputs and four digital
outputs on a single connector, as shown in
Fig. 1.
“Originally we proposed that the AES-3 ‘digital’
connector would always be I/O, but some members
of the committee felt this was too restrictive.
For example, a 16-channel AES-3 input card would
have required two connectors,” Drummond
said.
The standard states that “equipment using
this alternative shall be clearly labeled.”
But the nature of this labeling is under ongoing
consideration according to Yonge,
and as he said, “is expected to be addressed
in an amendment to AES59.”
With the D-25 pinout as shown in
Fig. 1, “the signal conductors and shield
(screen) contacts all have the same geometrical
relationship and so it should be
possible to implement wiring and PCB
track layout such that the EMC emissions and immunity
associated can be as low as possible and
the same for all channels,” Yonge said.
This was an important consideration, as the SC-
05-02 working group, the group within the AES
standards committee that is tasked with connector
standards, wanted to ensure that “cable shields …
needed to be connected correctly and consistently
to avoid the ‘Pin 1’ problem outlined in AES48 and
AES54, and to optimize EMC and shielding performance
in an increasingly dirty RF environment,”
Yonge said.
CONNECTOR GENDER
As for the gender of the connectors, cables are
male to male with the female connectors mounted
on equipment chasses.
The gender of the connector was set from the
start, Drummond said, “largely because that was what
Tascam did and this convention had been copied by
a number of other manufacturers. From a practical
point of view it made sense to have the more vulnerable
connector on the cable [as] it’s cheaper and
easier to change a cable end.”
D-25 connectors come with jackscrews to secure
the cable connector to the chassis connector. However,
there are different thread sizes in common use.
The standard recommends the use of jackscrews
with the 4/40 thread.
 |
| Steve Drummond |
“The jackscrew recommendation
was felt to be necessary
because of the noncompatible
jackscrews for D-type connectors
encountered in the field,” Yonge
said. “The reference standard, IEC
60807-2, permits either the unified
inch thread 4/40, or the metric
M3 thread, but these aren’t mutually
compatible. The group also
learned of other thread sizes in
use, including 2.6 mm. Jackscrew
incompatibility doesn’t help when
the intent is to connect equipment and have it stay
connected. The jackscrews really should work.
Accordingly, we added the recommendation, a
requirement would not have been practical, for the
4/40 thread as the size most commonly encountered
by our members.”
The process to develop this standard started in
early 2009. “The discussion that followed was fairly
intense, at least partly because so many people had
been using D-type connectors for audio over many
years that the detailed folklore tended to obscure the
goal of a simple, sensible standard,” Yonge said.
Now that the standard is published, and hopefully
will be generally adopted, “It will become easier
for professional audio users, exemplified by the AES
membership, to specify and connect audio equipment
with fewer last-minute surprises,” Yonge said.
“Rental equipment is an obvious candidate for standardized
connections, but cabling audio components
in fixed and temporary installations will also benefit.”
Mary C. Gruszka is a systems design engineer,
project manager, consultant and writer based in
the New York metro area. She can be reached via
TV Technology.