Sometime during the past five years,
streaming video on demand from
the Internet became a respectable
delivery method.
 |
| Pixelmetrix OMG dynamic dashboard gives an overview of OTT infrastructure performance |
Today, traditional broadcasters, networks
and many upstarts deliver a breathtaking
number of online playbacks every day, and
suddenly there needed to be methods for
monitoring, testing and measuring the stability
and reliability of this new delivery
medium. There’s even a new name for video
that’s delivered online on demand to viewers:
over-the-top (OTT) video.
Broadcasters are great at creating high quality
content, but delivering the content
online has been a puzzle as far as ensuring
that viewers got an experience as good as
the broadcast signal. Fortunately, several
companies responded with a variety of
products to allow just about every facet
of online video to be tested and measured.
“The traditional methods of video delivery
over IP are fundamentally different
from OTT,” said Danny Wilson, president
and CEO of Pixelmetrix. “OTT video delivery
uses regular HTTP servers and network
infrastructure for delivering video as
small files over reliable TCP connections,
as opposed to streaming packets over unreliable
UDP connections.”
Being a continuous stream separates
video from most other Internet traffic.
“The traditional metrics used to measure
HTTP traffic, such as the delivery of
HTML-like files, are not enough because
they lack visibility into the continuity aspect
of video,” Wilson said. “This calls for a
new approach to monitoring such delivery
mechanisms.”
Tyler Deneui, a sales engineer at Sencore,
a signal processing and test and measurement
provider in Sioux Falls, S.D., said
that understanding the basics of OTT explains
how it is different from other forms
of streaming video.
“The concept for OTT is that the end
user is able to view continuous video no
matter what network bandwidth is available
or how it changes,” Deneui said. “The
OTT protocols overcome many of the
negative characteristics that plagued previous
generations of streaming video such
as rebuffering and loss of video, but they
are still susceptible to many of the same
network-related issues that can affect any
network traffic.”
POINTS OF FAILURE
The traditional broadcast chain and the
impairments that can occur at each step
are well known, but OTT video has its own
chain with its own points of failure.
“OTT service could go wrong at multiple
points in the delivery chain, starting
from the origin of the content,” Wilson said
“The encoding quality at the origin is very
important. Media quality must be maintained
at the best possible level for each
bit-rate variant generated at the origin.
 |
Tektronix Sentry monitors the output of the
master encoders. |
“During delivery, the availability, distribution
and performance of cache servers,
usable network bandwidth and transit
time all contribute to the final video quality,”
Wilson added. “The way in which the
client works could also affect the viewer’s
experience, particularly the management
of player buffer, pre-fetch of content before
playing, dynamic management of consumed
media quality, as well as the timeliness
of fetching the next block.”
Although the recent growth of OTT
may have caught some off-guard, some of
the underlying technology—and its failure
modes—is familiar to the digital video universe.
“Broadly speaking, OTT video is sensitive
to the same types of impairment as
broadcast video using the H.264/MPEG-4
Part 10 or AVC video codec,” said Paul Robinson,
chief technology officer for video at
Tektronix in Beaverton, Ore. “That is macroblocking
caused by elementary stream
syntax errors and visible compression artifacts
caused by over compression of the
original content.”
HIGH-DEMAND VIDEO
It’s a given that some content will have
explosively high viewing demand for a
short time, such as a repeat of the Super
Bowl’s infamous “wardrobe malfunction”
or a hot “Saturday Night Live” skit.
“In the case of high-demand content,
viewer experience is always going to be
limited by the bandwidth available to the
servers and the number of total viewers
the servers are designed to handle,” Deneui
said. “It’s imperative that content creators
understand these limitations and prepare
accordingly for the release of content that
may be high-demand.”
Manufacturers have responded with a
variety of test and measurement solutions,
many of which focus on a specific part of
the signal chain. Tektronix has two T&M
products: Sentry, which is designed to test
“linear” content, and Cerify, which tests
file-based content prepared for use in ondemand
applications. Sentry monitors the
output of the master encoders for video and
audio impairments that might impact the
viewers’ Quality of Experience, and Cerify
is used to verify that on-demand (file-based)
content will be correctly decoded by the
playing device.
“Sentry and Certify are designed from
the outset to test and monitor the actual
video and audio content, rather than relying
on network, transport layer or other
statistics to estimate content quality,” Robinson
said. “Although this is difficult to do, it
is the only way to ensure that the viewers’
Quality of Experience is accurately represented
by the measurement results.”
Pixelmetrix, which has a history of assigning
witty names for its products, recently
developed the OTT Media Grinder…
OMG, for short.
“Pixelmetrix has developed a comprehensive
set of metrics, called VideoMargin,
to monitor OTT video delivery,” Wilson said.
“OMG is the first product in the family of
OTT technology solutions that Pixelmetrix
is developing.”
OMG can emulate thousands of OTT clients
with widely different behaviors, such
as iPhones, smart TVs, home computers and
tablets. These simulated devices consume
content in a preprogrammed manner, while
reporting the VideoMargin parameters and
any statistically significant deviations from
the expected values.
“VideoMargin metrics provide a single
‘five-nines’ type of measurement to indicate
the overall efficacy of the service,” Wilson
said.
Sencore’s VideoBRIDGE product line includes
a family of devices to provide statistical
QoS metrics for the smallest-to-largest
networks.
“The entire collection of products has
been created to easily scale with the size of
the network and provide a clear ‘at-a-glance’
understanding of current and historical OTT
network performance,” Deneui said.
Sencore’s VideoBRIDGE products monitor
the network delivery from the origin
server, through the content delivery networks
(CDNs), to the end devices. The company
also has the CMA1820 compressed
media analyzer and MPEGScan media file
verification system, which are used to monitor
and analyze content prior to its entry
into the OTT signal chain.
DIFFERENT SKILLS
At this early point in the life of OTT video,
it’s clear that the skills and knowledge necessary
to ensure the cleanest possible viewer
experience are in many ways very different
than traditional broadcasting.
“If content providers continuously educate
themselves on the technology and troubleshooting
techniques of OTT video, they
will be able to provide the highest-quality
product and user experience,” Deneui said.
“The OTT video world contains a variety of
standards, both proprietary and open, that
are ever-changing and require continuous
study and awareness by content creators.
There are also many adjacent pieces of the
OTT puzzle that require content creator
awareness and understanding, such as transcoding,
fragmentation, packaging, origin
server roles and CDNs.”
Tektronix’s Robinson agrees. “Operators
are still learning about OTT video, and widespread
experience of using streaming video
for ‘broadcast’ applications is still evolving.”
A decade ago, one of the buzzwords in the
industry was “convergence,” meaning that
the worlds of television and computers were
someday going to merge into a single, more
powerful entity. Although no one then could
have predicted exactly what we have today
with streaming video and OTT, it’s clear we
are now converged.
Bob Kovacs is a television engineer and
video producer/director. He can be reached
at bob@bobkovacs.com.