JOHNSTON, IOWA—Routers are not particularly
glamorous or exciting, but since they
are in most cases the foundation to the audio
and video signal flow through the plant,
I tend to want them to be simple, stable and
dependable. When we retooled Iowa Public
Television for digital, these were the qualities
we looked for that led us to select our
current Utah Scientific router system.
Although IPTV is not currently in the
market for a new routing system, I think it
is wise to stay on top of what is available.
I often approach this process by looking at
what we currently have, how our workflow
is changing and then trying to determine
what we would want to do if we were purchasing
one today.
One opportunity that I see in designing
a facility today is the combination of two
high ticket systems into a single package:
the router and the multiviewer. A number of
manufacturers now offer routing and multiviewers
in the same package and if you look
at the function of the two systems, the combination
makes perfect sense. IPTV’s current
Evertz multiviewer has been reliable but is
getting up in age and we’ve discussed about
whether to replace it in the near future.
METADATA LAYER
Looking into this led me to a story
about the new Harris Platinum IP3 router.
Initially, I was just interested in seeing
how they integrated the multiviewer
into the router package since
our installation involved an array
of distribution amplifiers. The Platinum
router incorporates the Harris
HView modules into the router frame
providing the ability to monitor all
of the audio and video inputs to the
router and drive a multitude of monitors
without the need for external
distribution amplifiers which for me
was kind of a nice feature.
One of the features that I liked in
the IP3 was the signal path layering.
When we did our planning at IPTV
we made the decision to be a discrete
audio facility, partially because
at the time, embedded audio was still
struggling with some glitches. I was
confident that the technology for
dealing with embedded audio would
improve but the main reason we
went discrete was that our creative
staff was simply much more comfortable with discrete audio and in a facility
the size of ours, there weren’t any significant
cost savings to be realized by going
embedded. The layering within the IP3 is
very similar to what we currently have
except that they have added a third data
layer for metadata which I believe will become
critical over time.
For more information, I spoke with
Kerry Wheeles, Harris’ director of product
marketing at Harris. One of my first
concerns was about this data layer and
how the router would handle embedded
closed captioning. Since we are working
diligently on ensuring that closed captioning
makes it through our systems to air, I
wanted to know what the IP3 would do
with closed captions embedded in the
digital video passing through the router. Kerry told me that in the current version
the router doesn’t touch the closed captioning
but passes it straight through. Harris
is currently looking at 5 or 6 possibilities
for utilizing the data path. One that is
in development is an input decoder module
that would allow the router to accept
IP or ASI input signals and route them to
any baseband output. Another potential
for the data path is the ability use it for
insertion of metadata such as closed captioning
into the output.
LESS DISRUPTION
Sustainability in a system such as a router
is of paramount importance. Given that
the router is the foundation of most facilities,
the idea of installing a system that
becomes obsolete or unsupported within
a few years of purchase is untenable as
no one wants to replace a router too frequently.
In addition, the system has to be
serviceable without too much disruption.
The IP3 inputs are clustered in groups of
9 while the outputs are in groups of 8 or
16 depending on system configuration.
Smaller grouping lends itself to disabling
fewer sources or destinations when a
card needs to be replaced. Another interesting
feature that I will look at in more
depth at the NAB Show is the ability to
perform and test system updates without
disabling or disrupting the operation of
the router. Software updates continue to
be one of the most troublesome chores in
any modern facility and the idea that an
update could be installed, tested and—in
the event of a failure or unforeseen side
effect, be reversed—is quite interesting.
Probably the thing that most intrigued
me about looking into the IP3 was not so
much the technology but the company.
When Harris announced that they were
looking to sell their broadcast division,
many of the folks who have been in the
industry for a while remember when Harris
and RCA were the giants. I am sure
that concern over whether Harris would
survive played on the minds of many
broadcasters when considering investing
in new equipment. The IP3 seems to be
an indicator that the new Harris will continue
to meet the needs of broadcasters.
Bill Hayes is the director of engineering
at Iowa Public Television. He can be
reached via TV Technology.