Deborah D. McAdams /
06.04.2014 08:00 PM
McAdams On: Regulation Fail
Network neutrality is a solution without a problem

Network neutrality is a solution without a problem, a debate of overly simplistic sloganeering and fueled by propaganda planted by digital behemoths like Google, Amazon, eBay and Facebook. But reality hardly matters. Somehow, Comcast charging Netflix for heavy traffic has been equated to the end of the Internet as we know it. There is absolutely zero evidence of this.

In fact, writes economist Tom Hazlett, “Networks routinely manage traffic and often bundle content with data transport precisely because such coordination produces superior service.”

So the Internet as we know it already has throttles If it didn’t, we’d all be knitting scarves while downloading SD episodes of “Fargo.” And now we’re expecting 4K content to be delivered online. Enforcing a hands-off policy on ISPs will surely motivate them to support that.

Now I am fully aware that as one of three citizens not on the payroll of an ISP who does not vigorously support network neutrality, I am setting myself up for pitchfork and torchery by its advocates. I’ve spoken up against it from the beginning, having witnessed Google literally start the whole mess. I also understand that net neutrality may be a fait accompli based on the steam-rolling momentum of Google-shaped public opinion.

I think this is unfortunate in the sense that rigorous analysis is being bypassed in favor of an emotional response.

I’ve seen nothing, for example, on the ramifications of regulating Internet service provision under Title II. What would the tax structure look like? Is this just a way for Google, et al, to get taxpayers to foot the bill for heavy traffic?

The other, perhaps far more relevant element to ISP regulation is that it hardly matters. The Internet itself is a frontier, as evidenced by the multiple sites that throttled the FCC itself after its circus of a vote on a net neutrality item.

Whatever Comcast, the FCC, et al, try to do to rein in the beast, someone is already coding a hack.

There’s innovation for you.



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Anonymous
Fri, 31-06-2014 04:31 PM Report Comment
Right. You bet. Network neutrality is a hoax. And I can't watch netflix because I have DSL and Verizon slows their stream just enough that I can't get anything without being repeatedly interrupted by buffering wheels on my screen. Or is that a hoax too?
2.
Posted by: Anonymous
Tue, 48-10-2014 05:48 PM Report Comment
Netflix, Google pay their fees to their ISP for access to the internet. I pay my fees to my ISP to access the internet yet the ISP now wants the content providers to pay for access to their network at the other end because of the demand the users on the ISP's network create. It is a classic case of the ISP's double dipping.




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB


 
Featured Articles
Research & Standards
Discover TV Technology