Doug Lung /
08.20.2009 11:15 AM
Stores Cited for Selling Non-compliant Wireless Security Cameras after Sprint Complains
The FCC cited Wal-Mart Stores (PDF) and Costco Warehouse Corporation (PDF) for selling Astak Model CM-918T2 wireless security cameras. FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) Laboratory's testing demonstrated these cameras do not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Part 15 of the FCC rules.

The investigation started in March 2009 when the FCC Enforcement Bureau received a complaint alleging that the Astak CM-918T2 caused harmful interference to Sprint-Nextel's licensed operation of its iDEN network in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. The FCC found that Wal-Mart was advertising the CM-918T2 on its Web site and found the device on sale at a Costco Warehouse store in Brandywine, Md.

The FCC citations did not go into detail on radiated emissions, but noted:

"Intentional radiators, such as the transmitter component of the Astak CM-918T2 wireless security camera, are generally required by Section 15.201 of the Rules, to be approved through the equipment certification procedures described in Sections 2.1031 – 2.1060 of the Rules prior to marketing within the United States. As an intentional radiator operating at 905 MHz and 924 MHz, the Astak CM-918T2 is also subject to the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.249(a) of the Rules for operations within the 902-928 MHz band. In addition, pursuant to Section 15.249(d) of the Rules, except for harmonics, emissions from the Astak CM-918T2 radiated outside the 902-928 MHz band must be attenuated by at least 50 dB below the level of the fundamental frequency or to the general radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules, whichever is the lesser attenuation. The OET Laboratory's tests demonstrate that radiated emissions from the Astak CM-918T2 outside the 902-928 MHz band substantially exceed the limits specified in Section 15.209 of the Rules. Therefore, the Astak CM-918T2 does not comply with the radiated emission limits specified in Sections 15.249(d) and 15.209 of the Rules."

It is encouraging to see the FCC moving quickly to stop the sale of unlicensed devices that cause interference to licensed services, but I wonder how long CM-918T2 cameras sold before the FCC issued citations to Costco and Wal-Mart will remain in service, creating interference to iDEN users. If a manufacturer takes similar short-cuts on TV band devices (aka "white space devices"), I'd be concerned about the interference they would cause to adjacent channel TV reception. The FCC has promised a rigorous certification process for TV band devices. From what we've seen in the Astak case, it will be needed!



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Thu, 59-20-2009 12:59 PM Report Comment
The FCC's marketing enforcement program is 99.99% complaint based and utterly toothless due to a loophole in the Communications Act (47 USC 302(c)). A couple years ago there were hundreds of complaints that 1.2 GHz wireless video cameras were being marketed and used in various security applications across the county. These cameras operated with powers generally ranging from 50 mwatts to 2 watts. The two watt models could cause interference to the FAA at airports at a distance of over 10 miles. A quick Google search will show that "1.2 GHz cameras", are still blantently advertised on the internet. FCC marketing enforcement is a joke.




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB


 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology