03.03.2009 04:00 PM
MSTV, NAB Challenge FCC Over White Spaces
The Association for Maximum Service Television and the National Association of Broadcasters now have their gloves on and have come out swinging in tandem at the FCC’s White Space Devices decision.

The two organizations, representing the interests of broadcasters and off-air television viewers, respectively, have decided to initiate a legal challenge to the Commission’s sanctioning of the WSD device technology, fearing that it will create widespread interference to television signals being delivered off-air.

MSTV and NAB have jointly filed a petition with the Federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia seeking redress for the television viewers who could be disenfranchised. The document specifically requests that the Court shelve the FCCs’s Nov. 4, 2008 decision allowing the manufacture and use of WSDs for wireless broadband communications in spectrum space previously set aside exclusively for television broadcasting.

Kris Jones, director of the NAB’s media relations, commented that engineering tests have shown that operation of WSDs in the television broadcasting spectrum is “a guaranteed recipe” for creating interference.”

“The NAB will continue to advocate on behalf of the millions of American households who rely on broadcast television for entertainment, news and information,” Jones said.

David Donovan, MSTV president, was somewhat more vocal in his statement regarding the recent filing of the petition, castigating former FCC Chairman Kevin Martin’s actions in approving WSD operation, and also questioning Martin’s timing in putting the matter to a vote.

“Many decisions reached during Chairman Martin’s administration did not comport with facts presented in the record,” Donovan said. “In this specific case, specific evidence of interference to over-the-air digital television and cable reception was ignored. Chairman Martin insisted that the FCC reach a decision on Election Day 2009, while members of Congress and the public were otherwise occupied.”

Donovan termed Martin’s actions a “rush to judgment” and stated that approval of the devices would cause interference to tens of millions of television viewers.

“Important rules and policies concerning review of scientific documents and public comment were cast aside,” Donovan said.

The petition was filed on Feb. 27 and seeks relief “from the Commission’s decision to permit unlicensed devices to operate in the broadcast television spectrum on the grounds that the decision was arbitrary, capricious and otherwise not in accordance with law.”

The off-air television advocate organizations ask that the “Court hold unlawful, vacate and set aside the [FCC’s] Second Report and Order and grant such relief as may be necessary and proper under the circumstances.”

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Melissa Sullivan
Wed, 03-04-2009 04:34 PM Report Comment
I live in a rural area and within the service contour of only ONE commercial tv station. However, I am just outside the contours of several others that provide dependable service. These other stations would NOT be protected and there is a risk these WSD's could totally disrupt those signals. In my opinion, they should find another spectrum for the devices.
Posted by: Melissa Sullivan
Fri, 03-06-2009 03:55 PM Report Comment
You need to fix your web site so we can read the stories!
Posted by: Melissa Sullivan
Fri, 03-06-2009 10:04 PM Report Comment
Yes, the story seems to be missing! 3/6/09, 10pm EDT.

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology