Doug Lung /
04.15.2011 02:15 PM
Likely Reallocation of TV Broadcast Spectrum Impacts Purchase Decisions at 2011 NAB Show

Manufacturers I talked to at NAB said that while they were getting some new orders for full power antennas, many customers were waiting to see the outcome of the FCC's effort to take away over half the UHF TV channels and auction them for wireless broadband use.

While there was much speculation about how these channels would be cleared and the impact on existing TV stations, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski in his remarks at the NAB Show provided a few clues. Genachowski acknowledged the interest in Mobile DTV in his comment, "We don't know what will work in the marketplace, but nothing the FCC is considering would or should interfere with market-based innovation around Mobile DTV." He spent more time talking about broadcasters' offering local news and other programs on the Internet. He noted that of the 28 commercial over-the-air stations in the New York market, only 6 invest in news coverage of any kinds and said, "it does affect any objective analysis of broadcast markets in view of national spectrum needs.

Perhaps I'm being too optimistic, but one of Chairman Genachowski's comments hints they might be willing to accept taking something less than 120 MHz of broadcast spectrum -- "Even if [emphasis added] 120 MHz of the 294 MHz allocated for broadcasting were freed up as a result of an incentive auction, a healthy and robust broadcast system would remain and nothing would change the terms of use of a 6 MHz channel, including mobile DTV." Another positive comment was "it's essential that broadcasters be treated fairly. That means, for example, that broadcasters should be fully compensated for any costs of any channel changes, and that any moves from UHF to VHF should be voluntary." That last point is significant.

From comments at the session, it is clear that many broadcasters will have to change channels. The only way stations that are now on UHF can stay on UHF after the reallocation, assuming the FCC takes 120 MHz of UHF spectrum, is for many stations to give up their spectrum completely or combine with other stations to share spectrum. Until the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is released, we won't know how this will work. It is reasonable to assume that while a move from UHF to VHF channels would be voluntary, the FCC will provide some extra incentive for stations to make the move. It will be interesting to see what happens between now and next year's NAB Show.

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Brian Smith
Fri, 04-15-2011 05:41 PM Report Comment
It is astonishing that the Emperor has never looked into the mirror to admire his new clothes. How does someone who knows so little about what he intends to do remain in office? Genachowski seems unaware that Satellite companies and cable operators alike receive many broadcast stations off-air with ordinary antennas to turn our signals around. He clearly has no idea what it really means to "share channels." In the spirit of "follow the money," who profits the most from the FCC spectrum grab? Not the U. S. Citizenry, I assure you. Who do you think is going to pay for the National Broadband plan?
Posted by: Brian Smith
Sat, 04-16-2011 09:21 AM Report Comment
In all these discussions about voluntary let us not lose sight of the fact that our income tax system is also classed as "voluntary". Twist anyone's arm hard enough and they will volunteer.

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology