Doug Lung / 09.23.2010 12:00AM
Internet Broadcast TV Delivery Business Sparks Comments

Broadcast signals may be free to receive off-air and enjoy at home or your business, but don't try to stream them over the Internet.

This week NAB issued a Statement on Recent Legal Action Involving ivi Inc. regarding a new Internet company, ivi TV.

The company had filed a "Declaratory Judgment of Copyright Noninfringement in the U.S. District Court in Seattle, Wash." in what ivi TV says is a "a preemptive move to discourage needless litigation from big media."

ivi TV began operations last week, offering delivery of network broadcast TV signals and sporting events to a subscriber's PCs for a monthly fee. The company contends that it is operating legally.

The NAB has a different view.

"It is blatantly illegal to steal broadcasters' copyrighted works and signals," said Dennis Wharton, the NAB's executive vice president. "We strongly support broadcasters and their program suppliers in their efforts to combat copyright abuse and signal piracy."

The NAB noted that in 2000, an Internet distribution service (iCraveTV.com) was enjoined by a federal court for copyright infringement after legal actions were taken by broadcasters, Hollywood movie studios and professional sports organizations.

Shortly after the NAB statement was issued, ivi TV's CEO Todd Weaver issued his own statement:

"We understand the NAB's point of view and welcome this opportunity to enlighten them. ivi TV (ivi, Inc.,) filed a lawsuit, because we were wrongly accused of copyright infringement, an accusation disruptive to our business. We needed resolution of these issues right away. We believe the copyright claims are unsubstantiated and are really just camouflage for trying to stifle innovation and competition."

He added that his company pays broadcasters "in accordance with the law, just like cable."

"This is not about copyright, this is about competition," Weaver said. "Broadcasters fought against cable companies, then joined them. Broadcasters then fought against satellite companies, then joined them. Now it is our turn. History has a habit of repeating itself--and it is unfortunate they cannot learn from that and realize we strongly support broadcasters and their program suppliers helping them monetize, increase their eyeballs, and ultimately get paid."



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Anonymous
Thu, 09-23-2010 - 9:01PM Report Comment
NAB had better let stuff stream, because other wise a lot of use will not be able to see their programs. I gave up on over the air do to the lack of being able to watch local tv. It goes away if it rains, wind blows, or anything else. I watch either on dish, or on internet.




Friday 2:09PM
Audio Mixers Raise Issues Plaguing 5.1 for TV
“The first time Janet Jackson was on our show, I was stupefied—no one from her camp ever came back to the room to talk to us about the mix." SNL associate mixer, Josiah Gluck


 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology