10.25.2011 12:30 PM
FCC Finalizes Rules for Broadband From Wall Sockets

WASHINGTON: Broadband access from ordinary wall sockets may yet become a reality. The Federal Communications Commission today affirmed its rules for Broadband over Power Lines with minor modifications.

“These rules provide an appropriate balance between the dual objectives of providing for Access BPL technology that has potential applications for broadband and Smart Grid while protecting incumbent radio services against harmful interference.”

Those incumbent radio services primarily comprise ham radio operators. Hams started lobbing grenades at BPL when the commission first adopted rules for it in 2004, saying it interfered with their operations. Their national organization, the American Radio and Relay League, filed a lawsuit against the FCC in federal court, seeking full access to unredacted versions of staff technical studies upon which the rules were predicated. The FCC was ordered to cough up the studies, allow public comment on them, and explain its method for measuring radiated emissions from BPL systems.

In today’s Second Report and Order, the commission said the resulting cycle of comments did not “warrant any changes to the emissions standards or the extrapolation factor,” but they were making “several refinements” anyway.

The SR&O modifies the rules “to increase the required notch filtering capability for systems operating below 30 MHz from 20 to 25 dB; establish a new alternative procedure for determining site-specific extrapolation factors...; and adopts a definition for the ‘slant-range distance’ used in the BPL measurement guidelines to further clarify its application.” Slant-range refers to the diagonal distance of a measurement device to a BPL transmitter mounted at the top of a power pole.

BPL allows electrical utilities to deliver broadband service over medium voltage lines to homes and businesses through electrical wall sockets. It also allows them to monitor power usage in the form of Smart Grid applications. The commission also noted that BPL provides yet another way to get broadband to the masses, one of the key objectives of the Obama Administration, and more recently, the International Telecommunications Union. BPL is said to support data rates of more than 500 Mbps and first- and last-mile ranges of 1,500 meters.

The commission said that while it endeavored to minimize ham interference, it remains a possibility in some instances that can be handled individually.

“While some cases of harmful interference may be possible from Access BPL emissions at levels at or below the Part 15 limits, the potential benefits of Access BPL service warrant acceptance of a negligible risk of harmful interference that can be managed and corrected as needed on a case-by-case basis.” the 76-page SR&O states.

The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers published its standard for BPL in February of this year. (See “IEEE Publishes Final Broadband-over-Power-Line Standard”)

~ Deborah D. McAdams, Television Broadcast




Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Wed, 32-26-2011 03:32 PM Report Comment
Another "well meaning" article written by someone who has no clue as to why this is such a "dirty" technology. It's technically absurd, has been generally discredited, and solves no problems. The telecom equivalent of "fresh water over sewer lines". Want a sip? Be careful about what you read in the press.
2.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Thu, 25-27-2011 10:25 PM Report Comment
BPL is also subject to outside interference. An experimental system in my area could be brought to a halt by keying up a typical mobile ham transceiver next to the lines. My 100 watt ham rig would the bpl signal very reliably. I'm not stopping my use of licensed frequencies. We need more broadband, but allowing monopoly incumbents to provide it is not in our best interests. WiMax with actual competition is a better idea, but the FCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of "The industry".
3.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Sun, 32-30-2011 12:32 PM Report Comment
Lobbing grenades, miss reporter? More like shooting a grizzly with a pea shooter. But like all things government, if we wait long enough the big shaggy FCC will dig their own hole and then fall into it. We hams will just be out there banging pots and pans making sure they get there in as direct a route possible.
4.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Tue, 53-25-2011 11:53 PM Report Comment
I object to your characterization of the American Radio Relay League's challenge to these rules as "lobbing grenades." If you'd taken the time to read at least part of the Second Report & Order, you would have seen that these challenges were not made willy-nilly, but were well thought out and appropriate. For example, the IEEE standard that you cite in the article calls for 35 dB notching, yet the FCC still claims that only 20 dB notching is sufficient, although this R&O does increase the requirement to 25 dB. 73, Dan Romanchik, KB6NU




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB

Wall Street Communications /   Friday 06:11 PM
Primestream Products on Display at CAPER 2014:
Wall Street Communications /   Friday 04:13 PM
Wohler Products at CCW 2014

 
Featured Articles
Exhibitions & Events
Discover TV Technology