12.21.2010 04:50 PM
FCC Codifies Network Neutrality
WASHINGTON:: The Federal Communications Commission today voted to regulate Internet traffic. The 3-2 vote was down party lines, as expected, with support from the Democratic members and dissent from the two Republicans. Commissioners voted on a proposal from FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski to prevent wireline broadband providers from throttling bandwidth-heavy users such as Netflix. The same rules would not be applied to wireless providers.

“The rules require all broadband providers to publicly disclose network management practices, restrict broadband providers from blocking Internet content and applications, and bar fixed broadband providers from engaging in unreasonable discrimination in transmitting lawful network traffic,” the commission’s announcement said. The order itself is not expected for another day or two.

Democrats and Republicans have fought over network neutrality for several years. Democrats contend it preserves an open Internet. Republicans contend it regulates the Internet unnecessarily. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said the rules represented a compromise because they allow usage-based pricing. The two commission Republicans nonetheless submitted stinging assessment for the record.

“I cannot support this decision,” Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker wrote. “It is not a consumer-driven or engineering-focused decision. It is not motivated by a tangible competitive harm or market failure. The majority bypasses a market power analysis altogether, and acts on speculative harms alone. The majority is unable to identify a single ongoing practice of a single broadband provider that it finds problematic upon which to base this action. In the end, the Internet will be no more open tomorrow than it is today.”

Commissioner Robert McDowell spit 35 pages worth of nails critical not only of the policy, but the process.

“On the night of Friday, Dec. 10, just two business days before the public would be prohibited by law from communicating further with us about this proceeding, the commission dumped nearly 2,000 pages of documents into the record,” he wrote. “As if that weren’t enough, the FCC unloaded an additional 1,000 pages into the record less than 24 hours before the end of the public comment period. All of these extreme measures, defying the D.C. Circuit, Congress, and undermining the public comment process, have been deployed to deliver on a misguided campaign promise.”

The grumbling spread fast. National Journal’s David Hatch is reporting that Verizon’s attorney’s are gearing up for a lawsuit. B&C’s John Eggerton reports that lawmakers are fixing to call the FCC to the carpet. Eggerton has more details on lawmaker reactions at “Hill as divided as FCC on Net Neutrality.” -- Deborah D. McAdams

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Tom Butts
Tue, 12-21-2010 06:26 PM Report Comment
When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail...when you're a lawyer, everything needs to be regulated or legislated. The FCC is now lawyer-dominated, so when an issue is considered, the engineering, or even the free speech implications (lawyers IMHO do not benefit personally from defending free speech nearly as much as from suing fast food establishments over hot coffee...no profit motive) are not given sufficient consideration. This is a perfect example. And, my analysis is assuming no nefarious under-the-table-deal intent...

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Exhibitions & Events
Discover TV Technology