Doug Lung /
08.26.2010 03:20 PM
Churches Face Wireless Mic Challenges

The elimination of frequencies above 698 MHz (channel 51) for wireless microphones does not appear to have had a major impact on broadcasters, as they were able to plan for the move and replace non-compliant equipment. Churches have not been as fortunate, as outlined in the article Consequences steep for churches that do not obey new FCC mic rule on www.thealabamabaptist.org.

Small churches say that they are finding it difficult to handle the expense of purchasing new wireless mics.

"For a smaller membership church, that's a pretty good outlet of cash," said Keith Hibbs, director of the office of worship leadership and church music for the Alabama Baptist State Board of Missions. "It is expensive; [but] it just has to be swallowed."

The article warns that church leaders could be held personally liable for fines amounting to more than $100,000, or imprisonment, if their church does not comply.

The article provides information on how churches can verify if their wireless systems are compliant.

It also highlights an area that proponents of the National Broadband Plan's goal of taking 120 MHz (almost half the usable spectrum for wireless microphones) from broadcast television may not have fully considered.

Recently I've heard reports that broadcasters are having trouble finding frequencies for wireless microphones, as LPTV stations move to channels below 52 and fill in all of the "vacant" UHF TV space that was formerly available for wireless microphones. Participants in the FCC Broadcast Engineers Forum pointed out that under the National Broadband Plan there will not be enough channels for all the full-power stations currently broadcasting in many of the larger markets and no channels for low-power TV and wireless mics.

The OBI analysis of the National Broadband Plan mentioned wireless microphones and LPTV, but provided no suggestion as to how these uses could be accommodated when there wouldn't be enough broadcast TV spectrum left to support the full-power broadcast TV stations, even with channel sharing.



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Mon, 38-30-2010 09:38 AM Report Comment
Public and private K-12 schools are also widely affected and generally unaware of the new FCC rule. The FCC could not have been suprised by the impact of this ruling; they just chose to burden the public with this expense just like they did the broadcasters with DTV.




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB

Sue Sillitoe, White Noise PR /   Thursday 09:10 AM
Fairlight Unveils the Next Generation of Audio Post Production
Wall Street Communications /   Thursday 01:00 PM
NUGEN Audio AES Product Preview

 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology