/
10.18.2011 12:00AM
Border Broadcasters Relay ‘Spectrum Repacking’ Concerns

WASHINGTON—American television viewers along the northern border with Canada could be among the most severely impacted if the FCC moves forward with its planned auction of broadcast spectrum, a group of state broadcast associations warned Congress recently.

In a letter to Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), Mark Allen, president/CEO of the Washington State Association of Broadcasters said that the auctions will limit stations’ access to spectrum and could force them to be “repacked” onto new channels. Because international treaties with Canada require stations along the border to avoid interference with Canadian stations, such repacking “could have a severe and irreversible impact on television viewers in Washington.” Similar letters were sent by the state broadcast associations of Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin to their respective senators.

In the DTV era, full power TV stations can have service areas of more than 50 miles in radius, but to prevent interference, full power TV stations operating on the same channel must usually be located more than 100 miles apart. A recent treaty negotiated with Canada for the DTV transition requires a 250-mile wide interference free zone that would, for example, prevent a station in Buffalo from occupying the same channel as a station in Toronto.

Allen noted the complexity of interference issues with border stations and noted that, based on an analysis from the National Association of Broadcasters, if the FCC’s plans for reclaiming 120 MHz of broadcast spectrum are successful, 84 of Washington’s 104 full power stations and TV translators/LPTV stations could be impacted by an incentive auction. “Eighty four of Washington’s television stations now operate above TV channel 30. Eight-three stations would not have a channel, forcing them to share channels with another station or cease to exist,” Allen said. “This includes 14 full power TV stations and 69 TV Class A and TV translators/LPTV stations. These 14 full power stations are located in the Seattle-Tacoma and Spokane markets.”

In the letter to Murray, Allen requests that Congress look into requiring a new memo of understanding, agreement or treaty with Canada. Such an agreement would require that any new channel that a border station has to move to because of the 250 mile interference zone, be “fully coordinated and approved by the appropriate Canadian administration and ensures that Washington broadcasters can continue to serve their current population and service area.”



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Thu, 10-20-2011 - 11:54AM Report Comment
This is why the FCC needs to have ONE Commissioner be an ENGINEER, and NOT all lawyers and lobbyists. Detroit will lose ALL channels but one. This is hogwash. The cellphone/wireless industry is stitting on 190MHz of unused spectrum. They also assume more people will demand their services, not true in these hard times. Also, why not force the cell/wireless moguls to USE their existing spectrum AND make their methods MORE EFFICIENT? Leave over the air TV alone, leave ham radio alone, leave everything alone as they are changing the subject and making this about making money for the government and the so-called safety / first responders. All lies for thier own good. Get some engineers in there to get the truth; please.
2.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Tue, 10-18-2011 - 3:47PM Report Comment
As usual the FCC has failed to do any homework of what border zone and treaty ramifications would become prior to hatching up their broadband plan. This Commission constantly ignores the laws of physics and does no small scale real world testing in any meaningful way, open to outside scrutiny. They seem to prefer backroom under the table testing kept secret to hide their oversights. Even assigning them engineers they will continue to ignore technical details and just assume that everything digital can just always magically work.






 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology