Doug Lung /
08.05.2010 02:10 PM
Bill Aims to Stifle Involuntary TV Spectrum Reclamation

Last week Representative Rick Boucher from Virginia introduced a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives cosponsored by Representative Cliff Stearns from Florida that would prevent the FCC from reclaiming TV spectrum on involuntary basis.

The bill states:

"The Federal Communications Commission shall not reclaim frequencies of broadcast television licensees or any other licensees directly or indirectly on an involuntary basis for the purpose of section 309(j)(8)(F) of the Communications Act of 1934."

While the bill, H.R. 5947 does not specifically prohibit spectrum fees, the language "directly or indirectly" appears to prevent the FCC from using fees to "indirectly" force broadcasters to give up spectrum.

Dennis Wharton, NAB's executive vice president of communications, threw his support to the bill.

"NAB salutes Chairman Boucher and Ranking Member Stearns for their vision on an issue of vital importance to tens of millions of Americans who rely on local TV stations for high-quality entertainment, niche programming and lifeline emergency news and information," Wharton said. "As NAB has previously articulated, we have no quarrel with incentive auctions that are truly voluntary, and the Boucher/Stearns bill is a clear step in the right direction."

The bill does not address what will happen to broadcasters who are broadcasting on channels that would be taken away for wireless broadband use. As I've outlined before, broadcasters that have to change channels could incur significant costs, especially if they have to avoid interruption to service on their existing channel. Will those costs be reimbursed?



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Thu, 58-05-2010 04:58 PM Report Comment
"...broadcasters that have to change channels could incur significant costs, especially if they have to avoid interruption to service on their existing channel. Will those costs be reimbursed?" Maybe they'll give you GM stock as reimbursement.
2.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Fri, 28-06-2010 08:28 PM Report Comment
Question: Could broadcast networks and/or television station owners bid in an auction (similar to the 700 MHz auction) for the spectrum they presently license? If so, this may be the only way from this point onward to guarantee TV broadcasters a place to stay in the electromagnetic real estate that is public spectrum. You know, "pay to play"?
3.
Posted by: Brian Smith
Fri, 07-06-2010 11:07 AM Report Comment
Here is my prediction: some of the costs will get reimbursed and such channel changes will not be treated as "involuntary."




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB


 
Featured Articles
Research & Standards
Discover TV Technology