Deborah D. McAdams /
04.26.2011 12:00 AM
Spectrum Crisis is ‘Science Fiction,’ NAB’s Study Concludes
WASHINGTON: The looming spectrum crisis is manufactured, according to a former Federal Communications Commission official. In a study commissioned by the National Association of Broadcasters, Uzoma Onyeije says the “spectrum crisis is factually revisionist.”

“Wireless carriers do not suffer from a nationwide ‘spectrum crisis;’ they face a capacity crunch in a limited number of locations. And there are a variety of tools at carriers’ disposal for addressing capacity concerns. However, policymakers have not adequately explored these tools,” Onyeije writes. He notes AT&T and Verizon’s migration to fourth-generation LTE, said to be twice as spectrally efficient as current third-generation wireless networks.

“Assuming spectral efficiency advances stay on their current trajectory, there will be significant--and to-date insufficiently examined--capacity gains for mobile carriers,” Onyeije notes.

He also points out that voice calls could be more efficiently handled as packet-based Internet Protocol rather than circuit-switched traffic. Offloading mobile Internet traffic to Wi-Fi fixed locations is also expected to rise, and therefore increase capacity. Onyeije quotes American Tower Corp. chief James Taiclet as saying the company’s 38,000 tower sites are at about 50 percent capacity.

“AT&T and other wireless operators could double the amount of capacity they supply with current spectrum by investing more in new wireless equipment on existing cell towers,” Taiclet is quoted as saying.

Onyeije, former broadband legal advisor at the FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, debunked the existence of the spectrum crisis now being used to justify the reallocation of 40 percent of the broadcast spectrum for broadband.

“In the final analysis, the impending spectrum crisis is not real,” he said. “In fact, it includes all the elements of a bestselling science-fiction novel. First, the story seamlessly merges reality and fantasy. Second, the tale includes dire predictions about the future if, and only if, the worst-case scenario were to happen concerning a long list of variables. Third, the account ignores all simple solutions in favor of a dramatic conclusion.

“And, of course, there is a manufactured enemy. In this case, many seem to indirectly and incorrectly believe that free over-the-air broadcasting is the enemy of mobile broadband. But this debate masks the fact that there are other spectrum resources available and that carriers and the FCC have meaningful alternatives to manage the increased demand for data services.”

~ Deborah D. McAdams

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Brian Smith
Tue, 04-26-2011 03:06 PM Report Comment
This is akin to the land grabs of the 1800s. The giant cell phone companies, Google, and Microsoft don't want to develop new devices in unproven spectrum when they can simply convince government leaders that TV should give up spectrum. Less cost to develop with proven devices in proven spectrum. Count the lawyers at the FCC. Then count the engineering experts. The FCC no longer cares about the technical aspects of their decisions - they're all about politics. Follow the money.

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology