Deborah D. McAdams /
03.11.2013 04:53 PM
Low-Power TV Stations Hang in Incentive Auction Balance
Replies due Tuesday
WASHINGTON – Daniel Grise of Dickinson, Texas, wants more free low-power TV channels, not fewer.

“The FCC forced me to purchase a new television set based on the promise of more free over-the-air channels,” he writes. “And the cable provider continues to overcharge for TV service, so I installed an antenna. Well, the options for content and signal are amazing; so many foreign language-based programs. Do not shut down my local LPTV station.”

Grise is among those individuals and organizations who have filed comments and replies on the Federal Communications Commission’s TV spectrum incentive auction Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The proposal excludes the nation’s 1,980 non-Class A low-power TV stations and another 4,175 translator licensees from participating. Only the 1,782 full-power and 465 Class A TV stations may relinquish all or some of their spectrum for a portion of the proceeds of the auction—and be guaranteed a channel assignment when remaining stations are repacked into a diminished spectrum band.

Consequently, non-Class A LPTVs may be squeezed off the band. Eric Wotila of Cadillac, Mich., implored the commission to preserve a digital LPTV station he started in his community.

“We’re able to make a 24/7 local news channel and two channels of classic television programming available to tens of thousands of antenna TV viewers in a rural area who would, without our station, only receive one or two channels with limited local programming,” he said. “Low-power TV stations that have operated in good faith and have complied with their license should be protected and kept on the air.”

The Advanced Television Broadcasting Alliance representing LPTVs said that when low-power licensees “accepted secondary status in the broadcast band, it was with the understanding that LPTV was secondary... only to full-power TV stations…. Under such parameters, LPTV owners spent millions of dollars building out their broadcast facilities, as well as applying for new LPTV licenses in the latest FCC windows. By stating the risks and then changing the parameters after broadcasters had spent considerable amounts of money, the FCC has essentially pulled the rug out from under LPTV broadcasters and the public they serve.”

The incentive auction NPRM is the commission’s foundation proceeding for re-assigning 120 MHz of television spectrum—20 TV channels—for wireless broadband. Victor Tawil of the National Association of Broadcasters gave a presentation at the Feb. 26 Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Conference on how the loss of spectrum would impact TV stations. In the last U.S. digital TV transition, concluded in 2009, 200 stations had to be moved out of the UHF band so that 18 TV channels could be auctioned off to wireless providers.

For the FCC to reclaim another 20 channels under similar conditions, a total of 391 full-power and Class A TV stations in 86 markets would have to relinquish spectrum, according to Tawil’s presentation.

Translator licensees are concerned about being frozen out of the repack. Several representatives of the Montana and Utah Broadcasters Associations met with FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai and his staff, seeking assurance that the repack wouldn’t turn into a wholesale “reallocation exercise.”

“While translators did not receive formal protection in the statute… in Montana, Utah and other Western states, they are numerous and serve critical functions,” their filing stated. “Between our two states, we utilize more than 1,100 translators, which amounts to more than the entire Eastern seaboard combined. A significant number of these television translators in our states are used to serve small, rural areas with local television signals. Indeed, many of these translators are owned by small, local community groups and ‘television translator districts,’ which are groups of individuals in a community that have organized to bring local television to their remote towns.”

They said that cable TV is “rarely available” in such rural areas, and that satellite TV was often “prohibitively expense for those living well below the poverty line. Free over-the-air television is often the only link to the daily news of the state and emergency information.”

The contingent asked the FCC to not take more spectrum in rural areas that what was necessary, and to allow translators in reclaimed spectrum to continue operating “until—if ever—that spectrum is actually used by the corresponding wireless carrier.”


Reply comments are due on the NPRM today, Tuesday, March 12.

~ Deborah D. McAdams

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: mike tonges
Tue, 03-12-2013 11:47 AM Report Comment
We spent in excess of $100k to convert our lptv station from analog 52 to digital 39 in 2011. We were not eligible for the NTIA grant program, as we were not considered rural enough in Canton, Ohio. I had to borrow on a home equity loan on my house to assist in the conversion. We are in an already congested tv spectrum area which includes Cleveland, Akron, Canton, Youngstown, Cambridge, Zanesville, Steubenville/Wheeling and Pittsburgh. Several of the full power stations in our market areas will be forced to find a lower channel. There may be no channel available for us to convert to again. Our station provides extensive local programming to our area. We televise high school football, basketball, soccer, baseball, softball as well as The University of Mount Union, Walsh University and Malone University athletics. We simulcast WHBC Radio's "Morning Show" weekdays and carry Live Christian tv broadcasts and several public affairs programs. We are also an affiliate of the RTV network.
Posted by: Anonymous
Tue, 03-12-2013 02:02 PM Report Comment
Debbie thank you for the write up I am in the second Largest city in Oregon and am the ONLY TV station that serves it (license stations are offices in Portland and Seattle and do not even know where Salem is let alone serve it). We are the only station that provides local sports coverage, the only outlet for business to advertise (cost efficiently) and local. And I just did a calculation on changing channel ONE of my transmitter and it came up to almost $500,000 Antenna replacement (top of a 1000ft stick) is the biggest chunk then new mask filter (will have to go to full power mask more than likely to boot, retune transmitter (assuming I can stay in UHF) and that is just ONE transmitter (and yeas I have three channel on it so I am using all 19mb) we have three transmitters most less cost but…. . We knew the risk when we got into this but it was ONLY if we interfered with a full power or they wanted to move NOT a cell phone company in effect. We would have thought a lot harder if that was the case “secondary to EVERYONE else” The LOCAL community has just begun to rely on us in both English and Spanish does the FCC/Congress think we have that kind of money then think again we will GO OFF THE AIR if we are force to move

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology