TAMPA, FLA. and CHARLOTTE, N.C.:
Every four years the political rhetoric
of Washington heats up and draws
in not only much of the country, but
much of the world. Viewers tune in
to watch the greatly hyped and anticipated
political conventions, when
the two major parties hold their
presidential nominating ceremonies
and finalize their political platforms.
This is an exciting time for broadcasters
as well, with extra revenue coming
in from political ads and hours of
anticipated news coverage. It is also a
major international news event with
broadcasters worldwide converging
to cover the nomination of the next
U.S. presidential candidates.
When nearly 15,000 journalists
along with officials from local, state
and federal agencies all descend upon
a single venue, the perfect technical
storm can develop. How will they
share the limited wireless frequencies
for broadcast and public safety?
Washington does not normally set
the example for how to share nicely,
but in the case of the political conventions,
they have been using a formula
that has worked for many years.
HOW THEY ALL GET ALONG
Every convention season, the National
Political Convention Coordinating Committee (PolComm), convenes to
pull it all together. The ad hoc frequency coordination
group, established by the broadcast
networks, has the Federal Communications Commission’s blessing to
serve as the frequency coordinator and radio frequency
spectrum manager at the three big presidential-related events (both conventions and
the inauguration).
The name “political convention” itself
denotes that politics will be involved. Bringing
government officials and national and
foreign broadcasters together in one venue
requires some finesse to satisfy all parties
involved. “We need everything to work as
much as they need everything to work,”
said PolComm Chairman Louis Libin when asked about the broadcast-government
partnership.
“No single person can do all the coordination,
so it becomes a team effort,” Libin said. There are three parts to the team; the
first is Libin’s committee, then there are the
local host cities, and finally the federal government.
“Most people believe that all we do
is coordinate with broadcasters, but in fact
the major part of what we are doing has to
do with the local governments and federal
agencies.”
 |
Members of Polcomm at the 2008 Republican National Convention. (L to R): George Jewsevskyj, FoxNews; Marc Majerus, local coordinator in Minneapolis; Kevin Parrish, NBC; Louis Libin, Chairman, Political Conventions Frequency Coordinating Committee; and Howard Fine, Database Administrator
|
The FCC is always the lead federal agency
and acts as the liaison with other federal
and state agencies. For the security component,
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) and Secret Service work together
jointly.
Local and federal law enforcement back
up the PolComm committee with legal
and enforcement authority but prefer to
remain in the background. As conventions
are very political by nature, much of the
federal and law enforcement component
prefer to have PolComm front and center.
“The agencies want to be invisible, so we
do the registration, coordination, approvals
and are the face of enforcement,” Libin said.
In order to share information and have
input on one another’s plans, each group
participates in the planning of
the other’s event.
“We have our committee that
the FCC sits on and they have
their committees that I sit on,” Libin said. For broadcasters to
share their coverage plans and
the government to divulge their
security needs creates a unique
working environment. “There
is a trust and understanding between
the groups, especially
when dealing with confidential
information.”
The trust Libin refers to is
hard earned. Libin and his team
have worked the last seven political
conventions, earning the
respect of their various partners
along the way.
TECHNICAL CHALLENGES
Referring to the challenges of making it
all work, “it’s about planning smart, assuming
the worst and planning for it,” he said.
“There will be in excess of 2,000 frequencies
being used inside the convention
hall at each event,” said Howard Fine,
the PolComm’s frequency coordinator and
long-time member of Libin’s team. “The problem
is that we have lost 30 percent of the
spectrum we once had.” Another challenge
is that most of the attending journalists want
their own individual wireless mic and IFB
frequencies. “The biggest thing is getting
people to understand that there isn’t an unlimited
amount of spectrum anymore,” Fine
added.
When someone applies for credentials
they are told that they will have to register
their wireless equipment, and if they are
caught using non-registered equipment they
risk losing their credentials and access to the
venue.
The wireless mics being used by foreign
attendees utilize very similar frequency
bands to those in the United States. Since the United States is the world’s largest market for wireless
microphones, most foreign broadcasters use
the same gear as U.S. broadcasters do. This
adds to the challenge of sharing spectrum
for multiple entities that are using the same
equipment and spectrum range. Analog
equipment is still around as well, so both
analog devices and digital ones have to be
coordinated to prevent interfering with one
another.
To help provide more RF bandwidth options
for the event, the FCC provides a special
permit for the use of the 700-to-800 Mhz
frequency range as well as extra space in
the microwave spectrum. “It’s unbelievable
they allowed it!” Libin said. “They have
allowed us so much latitude within all these
bands for the events.”
“This event is different than any other
event,” Libin continued. “Everyone becomes
a rights holder. If they are assigned a channel
they then have exclusive rights to use
it.” This adds to the challenge of making sure
that there is no duplication or overlapping
of frequency assignments.
ENFORCING THE RULES
There are several different procedures
put into place at each venue to control the
equipment being used. The
first of these is gate control.
All equipment is inspected
prior to being permitted on
site. The equipment must bear
a sticker that shows it was
preapproved by the committee
to be used inside. This is
followed up with spot checks,
during which committee
teams will stop and inspect
equipment to confirm it was
registered, and is operating
on its approved designated
frequency. The final element
is troubleshooting where the
committee and law enforcement
monitor and track down
signals that are causing interference.
The various law enforcement agencies
understand the importance of communications, said Fine, who has worked on
three previous conventions himself. “They
are radio people and understand interference
and the need to coordinate,” he said.
Active monitoring does not work in a
frequency-rich environment like the convention
hall, where there are too many frequencies
and too high of a noise floor for
easily pinpointing transmissions. In order to
track down abusers and misadjusted equipment,
the committee uses teams from several
agencies with spectrum analyzers and
directional antennas to triangulate the location
of the offending equipment.
“We have found every one of them,” Fine said of his experience tracking down
problems. “If someone uses a non-regulated
frequency, they will have us come down on
them like a SWAT team, as we have proven
in previous years.”
Fine said their efforts are designed
to protect everybody from licensed
users to the general public. “We look out for
local users first, as we don’t want someone
from a foreign country taking down a first
responder’s communications system,” he said.
Sometimes issues arise when something
as simple as a piece of equipment is
dropped and the damage causes frequency
spurs that interfere with other users. With
the level of importance of everyone’s
work at the conventions, the committee
takes its enforcement role very seriously.
WISDOM AND EXPERIENCE
“The conventions are one of the premiere
world broadcast events,” Libin said.
This is demonstrated by the fact that
this could be a pooled event with just a
few cameras, but everyone considers it
important enough to require their own
unique and individual take on it. “The
fact is that the whole world is watching.”
Both Fine and Libin note that the experienced
broadcast organizations they
work with always have wired backups.
“It’s not that they don’t trust wireless,
they just know that with so many unknowns
and factors beyond their control,
they prefer to be prepared,” Libin said.
Fine also wonders why so many become
dependent or require wireless
microphones over a traditionally wired
one. “You can tell when someone is on
a wireless mic,” Fine said. He feels that
sound quality from a wireless mic will
rarely sound as good as that from a hard
wired unit.
As long as wireless equipment is in
use though, the committee will continue
its work. Both men are excited about this
summer’s and next winter’s big events,
once again demonstrating how partnerships
even in a politically charged environment
can work.