06.12.2006 08:00 AM
Barton, Upton warn FCC on multichannel must-carry

Multichannel must-carry would violate communications law and the administration's free-market philosophy and should not be imposed on cable or satellite operators.

That's the opinion of House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Joe Barton (R-TX) and Telecommunications and the Internet Subcommittee chairman Fred Upton (R-MI). The two congressmen urged FCC chairman Kevin Martin to stay away from the issue.

Martin has said he will see if a majority of FCC members want to revisit the multichannel must-carry, which would require cable operators to carry every channel of digital programming transmitted by a television station.

“We believe that any such order would be inconsistent with the existing must-carry provisions [in the 1992 Cable Act],” Barton and Upton told Martin in a letter. “Forcing carriage of additional broadcast streams would only reduce the amount of capacity available for non-broadcast programming at a time when consumers are increasingly watching non-broadcast content and calling for more carriage of independent programming.”

The FCC rejected multicast must-carry in 2001 and again in 2005. Martin, who opposed the 2005 ruling, is trying for a third time.

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

No Comments Found

Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology