Deborah D. Mcadams /
03.08.2013 09:00 AM
McAdams On: Plateaus and Counter Trends

There is a conspicuous phenomenon in all things consumptive being ignored in the world of media—the plateau. The race to place TV everywhere is so breathless that the industry seems to be forgetting there are only so many eyeballs and hours in a day.

Granted, there were incremental increases in the early multiscreen metrics, which only makes sense, because more screens were measured. When out-of-home viewing consisted of TV everywhere else—airports, bars, airline seats, buses, gas pumps, etc.—it was roughly estimated. Advertisers said, “what-ever.” Now, there’s a chance for the TV biz to win back a little leverage as measurement methods catch up with the market. Increased usage initially will be detected, spawning market analyses predicting $120 bazillion in multiscreen delivery by 2016 based in part on a supervirus causing people to sprout spare heads.

Every ecosystem we consider—be it media, the economy or spectrum—relies on human behavior, which is finite, and functions like a sine wave. E.g., Hash jeans, Palm Pilots, “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire,” hats, shag carpet, Virginia Slims, interlaced video. The variation becomes constant long-term, but we don’t do long-term these days. We do now, not in the Zen sense, but in the immediate-gratification sense. And it gratifies us to think that growth curves that serve us will last and last and last and last.

They won’t.

Whatever increased usage is indicated in the early multiscreen metrics should be taken with a grain of salt. Much more may be spent on attorneys negotiating rights and fights among networks and Aereo, Dish, et al, than is to be made from mobile TV, which so far has been met with general indifference.

Even if it becomes a big deal for a while, history shows us that something else will get our attention.

That’s how we roll.

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Adrian Scott
Mon, 03-11-2013 04:49 AM Report Comment
I think that it may be misleading to assume that expressing reach in terms of the global number of eyeballs and hours in the day is the only thing than matters. One of the major change factors in the evolution of what we used to call "broadcasting" is the fact that marketing messages can and will increasingly be capable of being targeted at segments of the audience, even at individuals, directed by analytics and other forms of business intelligence, and exploiting new forms of measurable monetization strategy including such developing tools as product placement and click-to-buy. In such a scenario the metrics around "how many people are spending how much time watching how many screens" will become relatively meaningless in comparison with, ultimately, "how many people spent how much money as a result of this specific promotion." And there is no plateau involved. The growth potential of that kind of new phenomenon is infinite.
Posted by: Anonymous
Sat, 03-09-2013 01:30 PM Report Comment
Right on, Deborah!
Posted by: Anonymous
Wed, 03-13-2013 07:54 AM Report Comment

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology