When a major
storm hits the
nation’s largest
media market, not much
more can be said that
hasn’t already. Like Katrina
seven years earlier,
the true impact of Hurricane
Sandy may not be
felt for some time in the future, however it is
possible that it could affect some aspects of
broadcasting’s future.
The build-up to the storm was unprecedented
as weather experts warned residents
of the east coast more than a week
in advance that a monster was brewing in
the Atlantic and yet it wasn’t until at least
24 hours before it hit that anyone knew
exactly where it would make landfall.
The full scope of the 21st century media
ecosphere was deployed as broadcasters,
cable news networks and the Internet absorbed,
analyzed and debated how public
officials and coastal residents should prepare.
In the end, many lives were saved
because of these efforts, in contrast to a
similar storm in 1938 that hit the area that
claimed hundreds.
In the past, broadcasters have been accused
of sensationalizing their coverage of
hurricanes and other natural disasters in
an attempt to boost ratings; I myself have
been guilty of such criticisms. In this case,
however, the threat was accurately characterized
and once again our industry proved
how important broadcasting is in an age
of multiple media choices. For those consumers
that chose to ignore broadcasters
and other news outlets and rely on social
media for storm updates, the content may
have been more personal and immediate
but how reliable was it? In one instance,
a Twitter account, dubbed “comfortablysmug”
was accused of broadcasting misleading
tweets about the storm’s impact to
unsuspecting followers, according to the
Poynter Institute. In instances when public
safety is of paramount concern, it behooves
any media consumer to understand who is
reliable and who is not; and broadcasters,
while not perfect, have proved themselves
to be among the most trusted. In contrast,
many are on their own if they rely solely
on the Internet.
But it’s also that very same IP technology
that is allowing our industry to expand
the choices we have in providing coverage
to our viewers. As John Merli reports in
this issue, broadcasters relied on IP-ENG to
help fill in the gaps when other ENG technologies
couldn’t. Hurricane Sandy provided
an ideal testing environment for this
emerging technology and in most cases, it
performed flawlessly.
As for that other ubiquitous communications
technology, cell service, the report
card is not as positive. In addition to overwhelmed
connections, towers were also
damaged. Could mobile DTV play a part in
improving reliability in that industry? Will
the FCC take the events of the past month
into account when assessing the impact of
the upcoming spectrum auctions on the
dependability of over-the-air broadcasting?
One would hope so; let’s not rely on another
event like Hurricane Sandy to drive
that point home.