Tom Butts /
05.09.2014 05:00 AM
Drones Are Still Up in the Air
Feds just starting to move on them

Tom Butts

As broadcasters, sometimes it’s just as important to be in the air as on the air. Whether we’re capturing breaking news, covering a sporting event or providing live traffic reports, we spend a lot of time literally flying around. Our obsession with air coverage was even a key story angle to “Anchorman 2,” as the film pondered how news networks got caught up in the hysteria of covering car chases by air back in the ’80s, and how this obsession subsequently trivialized the news. 

What isn’t trivial, however, is the inherent danger involved in operating aircraft on a day-to-day basis, as we were reminded by last month’s helicopter tragedy in Seattle. Former longtime KOMO-TV News photographer Bill Strothman and pilot Gary Pfitzner were killed when their helicopter crashed. The accident struck a nerve in the community; for many citizens, broadcasters occupy a special role in keeping communities safe and informed. “These people and what they do are such a big part of our lives,” read one online post. “They help define this whole area.” Our sincere condolences go out to the families and friends of the victims and to the staff at KOMO-TV.

Our industry is not without its risks and probably never will be, but an obvious response to the dangers of air coverage is, of course, the drone. Drones have been on the drawing boards of a number of broadcasters and broadcast vendors for several years now. You couldn’t miss seeing or hearing them in the Central Hall at this year’s NAB Show—all promoting an activity that is, in essence, still mostly illegal in the United States.

Ready to fly
By now we’ve all heard of the potential of drones, from providing aerial news coverage and emergency response to postal services (Amazon) and perpetual Internet coverage, i.e. Google’s recent acquisition of Titan Aerospace to deliver Internet access to remote areas. Some broadcasters used drones to cover the Winter Olympics in Sochi.

The cost of drones, compared to a helicopter, and their ease of use make for a tempting market for broadcasters, but it could be a long wait before the rules are written. The FAA has stated that it doesn’t expect to meet its 2015 deadline. The agency will hold its first public hearing on the subject in Washington this month.

But the “buzz”—both literally and figuratively— that these devices made at the NAB Show is proof enough that we could soon see a viable and safer alternative for providing aerial news coverage to our viewers. And we can hope that the type of tragedy that occurred in Seattle will become ever rarer.

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

No Comments Found

Tuesday 03:07 PM
WMUR-TV Says FAA Drone Rules Preclude ENG
The FAA’s current rules and proposed ban on flight over people, requirement of visual line of sight and restriction on nighttime flying, effectively prohibit broadcasters from using UAS for newsgathering. ~ WMUR-TV General Manager Jeff Bartlett

Manor Marketing /   Tuesday 10:32 AM
Cobham takes on American Ninja Warrior
ignite strategic communications /   Tuesday 07:12 PM
Bexel Expands Inventory with Investment in Fujinon Cabrio Lenses

Featured Articles
Product News
Discover TV Technology