|
Date
|
Story title |
| (08.09.06) |
Juggling Antennas for 2009 Requires Planning
The last FCC "use-it-or-lose-it" deadline has passed and most stations with a tentative DTV channel designation on their existing DTV channel, have constructed their fully maximized facilities.
|
| (06.14.06) |
NAB RF Reflections: A-VSB and DTx
At NAB this year, walking around booths displaying products on video-over-IP and video to handheld devices, it was easy to forget that some people still watch TV from high-power transmitters.
|
| (04.12.06) |
What to Expect at NAB2006 for RF
NAB2006 this year should be interesting as manufacturers deal with an anticipated drop in demand for high-power TV equipment after the last maximization deadline passes in July and stations wait for the announced end of analog TV transmission in February 2009.
|
| (02.08.06) |
Is Your Transmission Line Digital TV Ready?
When designing a new DTV transmission facility or planning DTV conversion of an existing analog facility, in addition to selecting a transmitter with sufficient power and an antenna that has the correct tradeoff between gain and elevation pattern, be sure to consider the transmission line.
|
| (01.25.06) |
Crazy Enough to Build Your Own TV Antenna?
This month, I'll take another look at receive antennas for DTV. My article "Antennas for DTV Reception" in the March 6, 2002 column on antennas for DTV reception was published almost four years ago, yet hardly a week goes by that I don't get a request for Fig. 1, which shows the dimensions for a do-it-yourself UHF TV rhombic antenna.
|
| (12.07.05) |
FCC Proposes Rules For DTx
This month, I'll examine the FCC's rulemaking on DTx released Nov. 4; two papers presented at the IEEE Broadcast Technology symposium in October; and results of tests on Samsung's new Gemini VSB chipset at CRC Canada.
|
| (11.09.05) |
How Hard is it To Receive DTV? Part II
Last month, I looked at the technical arguments in the debate over how to determine whether a household can receive a local network affiliate's DTV signal and thus is not allowed to receive a distant network DTV signal via satellite. This month, I'll finish the discussion with more details on the debate and reply comments from Meintel, Sgrignoli and Wallace (MSW) on behalf of NAB.
|
| (10.05.05) |
So Just How
Hard Is it To Receive DTV?
Earlier this summer, an interesting debate developed around the
FCC Notice of Inquiry on "Technical Standards for Satellite-Delivered
Network Signals" over how to determine whether a household can receive
a local network affiliate's DTV signal over-the-air.
|
| (09.07.05) |
Broadcasting To Cell
Phones
This month, I'll focus on technology that will deliver over-the-air
TV to consumers, but that won't use broadcast TV transmitters in
the United States.
|
| (08.03.05) |
Check Your DTV Signal With These Low-Cost Tools
This month, I'll provide a more detailed look at Rod Hewitt's TSReader program.
|
| (07.06.05) |
Elevating Accuracy in
Longley-Rice Coverage
Using the most accurate data possible when designing a new broadcast
facility reduces the chances of real-world coverage problems.
|
| (06.08.05) |
NAB Spotlights
RF T&M Gear for DTV
As I've written before, I felt there was a great need for easy-to-use
equipment for monitoring 8-VSB transmissions and ATSC streams. There
was no shortage of DTV and 8-VSB test equipment at NAB this year.
Prices were low enough. There is now no excuse for not knowing exactly
what your station is transmitting on DTV.
|
| (04.06.05) |
Channel Election
Choices Revealed
Let's take a more detailed look at the channel elections on a band-by-band
basis.
|
| (03.09.05) |
Going to Digital
ENG: 30 Months and Counting
All 2-GHz broadcast equipment will be upgraded to digital technology
and will be operating under a new band plan that keeps the same
number of channels but reduces their width to 12 MHz.
|
| (02.02.05) |
Do-it-Yourself
Longley-Rice Studies
Many readers have asked how they can generate terrain-sensitive
coverage maps like the ones I've used in my columns.
|
| (01.05.05) |
IEEE II: Receive
Antennas & Unlicensed Devices
This month, I continue my coverage of papers at the IEEE 2004 Broadcast
Technology Symposium with a look at a paper by Kerry Cozad outlining
receive antenna measurements, and William Meintel's evaluation of
the FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to allow unlicensed
devices in vacant TV channels.
|
| (12.08.04) |
DTV Transition Discussed
At IEEE BTS 2004
Last month, I reviewed a petition by Hammett and Edison for reconsideration
of the FCC's Second DTV Periodic Review Report and Order.
|
| (11.10.04) |
Coverage Complicates
Channel Elections
This month, I'll examine the options stations have in the channel
election process.
|
| (10.06.04) |
Transmitter Options for Digital
Televsion
Now that the FCC has set deadlines for maximizing or replicating
coverage, many stations will be looking at upgrading DTV transmitters
or in some cases even replacing them.
|
| (09.08.04) |
DTV Antenna Coverage Illustrated
This month, I'll outline some factors to consider when designing
a DTV antenna.
|
| (08.04.04) |
Choosing a Final
DTV Channel
This month, I'll look at some of the things to consider when deciding
on a DTV channel, and also relay some information I received from
readers about low VHF DTV.
|
| (07.07.04) |
RF@NAB:
DTV Reception And Interference
At NAB2004, broadcast engineers were focusing on getting ready for
the shutdown of analog TV.
|
| (05.05.04) |
Low-Band VHF DTV Revisited
My March 10 column "DTV on Low-Band VHF Channels" generated a large
amount of e-mail. Many of the comments described experiences receiving
low-VHF analog and DTV stations (Channels 2-6) and a few others
focused on the reasons low-VHF DTV reception is difficult. This
month I'll share some of those comments with you and offer some
ideas on why low-VHF DTV reception is such a challenge.
|
| (04.07.04) |
NAB 2004:
RF Expectations
This month I'll outline what I expect to see at NAB and highlight
some of the more interesting papers on the NAB Broadcast Engineering
Conference schedule.
|
| (03.10.04) |
DTV
On Low-Band VHF Channels
Last month I heard from a reader asking my opinion on whether they
should keep their UHF DTV channel or go back to their low-VHF analog
channel for digital at the end of the DTV transition when analog
TV is shut off.
|
| (02.04.04) |
Broad
Signals
Increasing frequency congestion has made it necessary for broadcasters
to pay attention to the bandwidth and spurious signals from all
their transmitters if they want to be good neighbors and avoid a
citation from the FCC. Broad signals are not appreciated!
|
| (01.07.04) |
RF
Reflections and Predictions
This month I'll look back to address comments received on my November
RF Technology column and look forward to TV broadcast RF issues
I believe will be important in 2004.
|
| (12.10.03) |
The 53rd
Annual IEEE Broadcast Symposium
There are many fine technical conferences and broadcast shows in
early Fall, but the one I always make it point to attend is the
IEEE Broadcast Symposium, held in October in Washington D.C.
|
| (11.12.03) |
DTV Interference
to Analog TV Reception
This month I'll use two recent examples of DTV-to-analog interference
to show how I analyzed the interference and determined some possible
reasons how it could happen. |
| (10.10.03) |
FCC Bulletin
OET-69 Limitations
The FCC database used for FCC Bulletin OET-69 interference studies
does not include TV stations' real antenna patterns.
|
| (09.03.03) |
Useful RF Help
On the Net
When I started my RF Web site back in 1995, there were few with
information on RF and TV broadcasting. Eight years later, almost
any question about RF can be answered with a quick Google search.
|
| (08.06.03) |
Calculating
RF Power Density and Exposure
The FCC is actively checking broadcast sites for compliance with
FCC Rules §1.1310, RF radiation exposure limits.
|
| (07.09.03) |
RF
at NAB2003: DTV Reception, Part 2
In my last column I discussed transmission technology at NAB2003.
This month I'll wrap up NAB coverage with a look at DTV reception
technology discussed at the convention.
|
| (05.14.03) |
RF
Highlights at NAB2003
At this year's NAB, the focus was not on debates about DTV standards
or the transition, but discussions on how to make DTV transmission
and reception work and improve DTV broadcast equipment. Part
I
|
| (04.07.03) |
TV RF
at NAB2003
This month I'll describe some of the new products and technology trends
I'll be investigating at NAB2003. |
| (03.05.03) |
Minimizing Delays
in Single Frequency Networks
Last month I explained how a single frequency network (SFN) could
improve DTV coverage by filling in shadowed areas and by providing
the stronger field strengths required for indoor reception. This month,
I'll look at ways to minimize delay in an SFN and look at proposed
standards for distributed transmission (DX). |
| (02.05.03) |
Single Frequency
Networks for DTV Part I
In my December column I predicted that the future of free terrestrial
over-the-air DTV would depend on reliable set-top antenna reception.
Single-Frequency Networks were discussed at the 2002 IEEE Broadcast
Technical Symposium as a way to improve DTV reception. Over the next
two months, I'll focus on this technology and discuss some of the
challenges in implementing it. |
| (01.08.03) |
New Year's RF
Ramblings
To start out the New Year, I thought I'd share my opinion on
where we're headed in the DTV transition. I've also included a report
on the smart antenna described at the IEEE Broadcast Technical Symposium.
|
| (12.11.02) |
IEEE Symposium:
Improving DTV Reception
This month I'll report on this year's IEEE Broadcast Technical
Symposium in Washington, D.C. This is one of the best conferences
for learning about new technology in RF for broadcast. This year there
was also an interesting paper on Ka-band satellite links. |
| (11.13.03) |
Enhanced
Propagation Of TV Signals, Part II
This month I'll look at station characteristics that make some stations
more likely to experience enhanced propagation and offer some suggestions
on designing facilities to help overcome co-channel interference.
|
| (10.09.02) |
Enhanced Propagation
of TV Signals
Interference between DTV and analog stations sharing the same
channel was back in the in the news this summer when WBOC in Salisbury,
Md,. reported problems with interference from WHRO-DT in Hampton
Roads, Va.
|
| (09.04.02) |
Rebuilding NYC
TV Transmission After 9/11
This month I'll look at some of the challenges New York City
broadcasters face restoring TV coverage to what existed Sept. 10,
2001. As promised last month, I also will outline some of the reasons
DTV to analog (and vice versa) interference in some cases is likely
to be greater than what was previously predicted.
|
| (08.07.02) |
Developments In
DTV Transmitters
This month I'll offer some tips on choosing a low-power DTV (LP-DTV)
transmitter. |
| (07.10.02) |
Low-Power DTV
at NAB
In my last column I looked at DTV reception technology at NAB2002.
This month I'll look at the other end of the path -- DTV transmission,
specifically low-power DTV transmission.
|
| (06.26.02) |
DTV Reception
Advances At NAB2002
Consumers have gotten used to easy NTSC reception. If the picture
looks bad, move the indoor antenna around a bit and you can usually
get a watchable picture. Even if the picture is poor, if the program
is interesting enough, the viewer will usually continue watching
it if the audio holds up ... DTV is not as easy. Once reception
is lost, it isn't always obvious how to get it back!
|
| (05.01.02) |
Receive Antennas
Revisited
My March column on DTV receive antennas generated more e-mail
than any column I've written in a long time. I'll share the responses
and look at what a report from the ATSC had to say about DTV receive
antennas.
|
| (04.03.02) |
What I Want at NAB
This month I'll outline some of the things I'll be looking for at
NAB2002. Rather than talk about specific new products, I'll focus
on the areas where I'm expecting to see interesting developments. |
| (03.06.02) |
Antennas for DTV Reception
In recent columns, I've discussed options for TV-transmitting
antennas. This month, I'll look at the other end of the path
outdoor TV-receiving antennas. I'll describe desirable attributes
for DTV reception, look at some of the types of antennas available
and tell you how you can build a simple UHF receiving antenna. |
| (02.06.02) |
Antenna-Mounting Issues
Lately Ive run into a number of situations where I had to optimize
coverage from a less than ideal antenna location. By location, Im
referring to the antenna location on the tower. |
| (01.09.02) |
IEEE Broadcast Symposium,
Part 2
In my November column, I described some of the papers covering DTV
reception presented at the 2001 IEEE broadcast symposium. This month
I'll look at two papers dealing with DTV transmission. |
|
(11.28.01)
|
Lessons
Learned at IEEE
During the weeks following the attack on the World Trade Center
I was busy assisting our local engineering staff in restoring the
WNJU signal at the Armstrong Tower in Alpine, N.J.
|
| (09.05.01) |
Philips, NxtWave
Describe Their Plans
In response to my July column I heard from many of you about the
efforts that manufacturers are making under the ATSC 8-VSB improvement
effort. Philips and NxtWave sent me additional background on their
proposals, some of which I will talk about here.
|
| (08.08.01) |
2 Measuring
and Extending DTV Coverage
Cable carriage of broadcast stations DTV signals is not mandated
under current FCC rules as long as their analog station is carried.
|
| (07.11.01) |
1 8-VSB
Enhancements Will They Work?
Last year, at NAB2000, the hot topic among TV broadcast engineers
was whether or not COFDM would be allowed to join 8-VSB as one of
the authorized DTV modulation formats.
|
| (05.02.01) |
FCC Defines DTV City
Grade Contour
How do you define DTV coverage? Since 1997 the FCC has defined it
as the 41 dBu F(50/90) contour for UHF stations, 36 dBu for Channels
7-13 and 28 dBu for Channels 2-6.
|
| (04.04.01) |
RF Ramblings Anticipating
NAB 2001
The annual NAB convention is the most visible forum in North America
where engineers report on the achievements of the previous year
and show what they hope to achieve in the following year.
|
| (01.10.01) |
Combining
High Power TV Signals Analog and Digital
There has been a lot of interest recently in combining multiple
NTSC and DTV signals onto one antenna. The reasons for this are
simple tower real estate is expensive and, in some cases,
existing towers arent going to be able to support additional
DTV antennas.
|
| (year 2001) |
8-VSB vs.
COFDM: The Debate Continues
Over the last few months, me and many others have written about
the relative merits of COFDM and 8-VSB for DTV. It is the most pressing
issue facing broadcasters today.
|
| (year 2001) |
Exotic Modulation
Beyond 8-VSB
There are currently some new, exotic modulation methods under development.
Although these methods are not likely to be used for traditional
broadcasting, the technology behind them is interesting and will
affect broadcasting in one way or another in the years to come.
|
| (10.31.00) |
Antennas Garner Attention at
IEEE Symposium
The IEEE Annual Broadcast Technical Symposium (IEEE-BTS), held
this year in Tysons Corner, Va., is the best conference for
learning about new broadcast RF technology.
|
| (year 2000) |
Comparing 8-VSB
and COFDM for DTV Broadcasting, Part II
After reading last month's column you may have concluded
that the DVB-T COFDM transmission system had enough advantages over
the ATSC 8-VSB system to justify using it to replace or supplement
8-VSB.
|
| (year 2000) |
Comparing 8-VSB
and COFDM for DTV Terrestrial Broadcasting, Part I
Several events are causing many broadcasters to wonder whether
the ATSC 8-VSB modulation method was the best choice for U.S. digital
television terrestrial broadcasting (DTTB).
|
| (year 2000) |
Modulation Standard Debate Intensifies
We might as well start with the bad news. After spending time at NAB2000
with proponents of both COFDM and 8-VSB, it looks like reliable consumer
reception of DTV with indoor antennas is at least a year away and
perhaps as much as three years away. |
| (year 2000) |
Over Hill, Over Dale
Software for Predicting Coverage Maps and Plotting Microwave
Path Comes of Age
Over the years, I've written about software that could be used for
predicting coverage maps and plotting microwave paths. Until now,
none of the inexpensive software maps had sufficient resolution
to be used for plotting microwave paths.
|