|
Date
|
Story title |
| (08.09.06) |
How Do You Get From Producer to Viewer?
Alert readers may recall that I started to open a new can of audio worms last month.
|
| (06.14.06) |
Another Can of Audio Worms
We tend to gloss over some of the production difficulties we face as a consequence of our current broadcast distribution system.
|
| (04.12.06) |
TV Levels: A Canadian's View, Part 2
You may recall that last month I wrote about audio guru Neil Muncy's observations regarding television audio level problems he encountered in Canada.
|
| (03.08.06) |
TV Levels at Home: A Canadian View
History buffs and reasonably alert readers may recall that back in the day (2003-04), I wrote several articles dealing with the disarray of audio levels at our beloved end-users' sofas, couches and recliners.
|
| (01.11.06) |
Surround Sound Suffers From Poor Presentation
As I pondered it all on the way home and began to prepare for a largish public surround-sound presentation, I realized I had some serious concerns about what I had seen and heard. I'd like to share them with you, as they may have some impact on the effectiveness and salability of our surround production efforts.
|
| (11.09.05) |
More About the LFE Channel & Subwoofer
Some of the more alert readers among you may recall that in my August column I wrote about the low-frequency effects channel in multichannel video and music production, and made some observations about how it fits into the end-user environment.
|
| (10.05.05) |
The
Center Channel: Unique and Difficult
As you may recall, I've been reviewing the function of the various
channel groups in surround sound, including a consideration of how
they came to be, how they can be approached in various types of
production, and how they end up being used by our beloved viewers
in their homes. This month, I'll discuss the most challenging channel:
the center channel.
|
| (09.07.05) |
The
Care and Feeding of Surround Channels
Last month, as part of my current work involving surround sound,
I wrote about the use of subwoofers, from the viewpoints of both
audio professionals and consumers. This month, I'll tackle the surround
channels.
|
| (08.03.05) |
LFEs and Subwoofers In Perspective
I've gotten involved in surround sound as a music producer, mixer, and user consultant, all at once. This month, I'd like to share what I've been finding about how we are using the subwoofer and the LFE (low frequency effects) channel.
|
| (07.06.05) |
Suddenly Inundated
With Surround Work
Over the past couple of months, professional things for me have
been happening on a lot of fronts. It's worth sharing because it
bodes well for all of us in the 'biz.
|
| (06.08.05) |
Audio
for Home Theater Presents New Challenges
I was interested and pleased to receive a Tweeter catalog in the
mail that described a fairly comprehensive installation offer. The
Tweeter program includes the sort of installation, setup and follow-up
service needed to make these systems work reliably in peoples' homes.
|
| (04.06.05) |
What
is HD Home Theater Like for Consumers?
While I expected HD to be better, I didn't expect it to be quite
so freakin' much better, if you know what I mean.
|
| (03.09.05) |
AV 107:
The Basics of Audio Interconnections
This is for those among us who don't know a lot about audio and
are not quite sure we should ask.
|
| (02.02.05) |
Where
Exactly Is Audio in 2005?
Back at the turn of the millennium (remember that?), I did one of
those smarmy Fugawi columns where we took stock of where we were
and made some brave, brash and perhaps foolish predictions about
where we were gonna be. Well, five years have gone by, and it's
time for a fresh look.
|
| (01.05.05) |
A/V 106:
Surround Sound For Broadcast TV
This column will be devoted to the basics of surround sound for
video, as part of my series for non-audio folks.
|
| (12.08.04) |
The Truth
About Stereo for TV
This column will be devoted to the basics of stereo for video, as
part of my series on "the basics."
|
| (11.10.04) |
A/V
104: Time-Domain FX and Reverb
This column will be devoted to the basics of time-domain signalprocessing
effects, most notably reverb.
|
| (10.06.04) |
A/V 103: The Basics
of Audio Compression
This column is devoted to the basics of audio compression, a powerful
signal-processing technique that is poorly understood by almost
all of us.
|
| (09.08.04) |
Audio 102 for
Video Folks: A Primer on EQ
This article will be devoted to the basics of equalization, or "EQ,"
for those of us who aren't really all that familiar or comfortable
with audio (which is most of us in the biz, I've found).
|
| (08.04.04) |
Audio 101
for Video Folks: Levels
I'm going to devote a couple of columns to audio basics for video
folks.
|
| (07.07.04) |
Revenge
of the Couch Potato
Our Story To Date. Alert readers may recall my recent concern with
the variance in audio levels as experienced by us home viewers.
|
| (04.07.04) |
A
Trip Down Memory Lane: Some Good Audio
About a month ago, I got a package in the mail containing a bunch
of CDs, a long letter and some magazine articles from a guy named
Ron Estes. Naturally, if you don't know, you're gonna ask. Who Is
Ron Estes?
|
| (03.10.04) |
Metadata
in the Home: A Case History
Alert readers will recall that I've been struggling to understand
the use of metadata, particularly dailnorm, in TV broadcasting.
This month I thought I'd share with you my adventures with it to
date.
|
| (02.04.04) |
The Mystery
of the Set-top Box
The various audio outputs have a variety of applications and each
of them have different capabilities as well. These behaviors are
based on differing assumptions about the intended performance and
capability of the system, based on which output is selected. This
is a serious potential booby trap.
|
| (12.10.03) |
DialNorm
101
Dialnorm makes it possible for us to fairly easily achieve consistent
dialogue levels at the outputs of decoders. All we've got to do,
collectively speaking, is understand the process, make the correct
moves, and it's done. Voila!
|
| (10.10.03) |
Film
vs. Music
Music and film are quite different from a production standpoint, and
a one-system-plays-all modality has to serve multiple sets of needs,
often simultaneously. |
| (09.03.03) |
Surround
Sound Field of Dreams
I recently attended the Audio Engineering Society's Technical
Conference on Multichannel Audio, held in late June in Banff, Canada.
|
| (08.06.03) |
Finally!
A Loudspeaker That Raises the Bar
Alert readers will recall that I've been hinting about some new loudspeakers
that I've been involved with, for quite some time now. Well, they're
out and they are definitely worth talking about! |
| (07.09.03) |
Loudspeakers
as Musical Instruments
Recently, I attended the Acoustical Society of America's annual
convention in Nashville and presented a paper on "The Loudspeaker
As A Musical Instrument." Writing the paper was a lot of fun, and
it gave me an excuse to formalize a lot of the thoughts I've been
having about loudspeakers.
|
| (05.14.03) |
The 'Aesthetics'
of Audio Compression
I recently received a letter from Tom Lento, a broadcast technology
marketing consultant, commenting on my March 5 column about the
variance of audio levels in TV programming.
|
| (04.07.03) |
The
Growing Gulf Between High- and Low-Res Audio
From where I work, there seems to be a growing divergence within audio
media, and it's making me crazy. There's a growing split between high-
and low- resolution formats, with high-res getting higher and low-res
getting, well, lower. |
| (03.05.03) |
Why
Not Just Set the Level Once and for All?
The tried-and-true solution that broadcasters have used for years
to maintain stable levels is fairly massive compression and/or limiting
prior to transmission. But, two problems exist with such processing.
|
| (01.08.03) |
Codecs
in Review
You all know what codecs are, right? But why do we encode and
decode? Why don't we just hit the transmit or record button? You
know the answer to this one too, right?
|
| (11.13.02) |
More Thoughts
About Copy Protection
Since I wrote my column on copyright, I've received some e-mails
about it and I've noticed that the issue is alive and kicking in
other industries as well. These merit further discussion, I think,
so I'll continue my brief digression from pure audio for another
month or so.
|
| (09.04.02) |
Musings About
9/11, Our World and Our Industry
What a year! It's been 12 months now since the terrorist attacks
on our country. What's happened? Where are we?
|
| (08.07.02) |
Some Thoughts
About Copyright
Copyright issues in media have been in the mainstream news and
in TV Technology recently. A number of important problems
have been rattling around over the past couple of years, and it's
beginning to look like a bumpy ride.
|
| (07.10.02) |
Dolby
C: How Dolby Sees It
Alert readers will recall that I've been ranting about "bad
audio" for a number of months, and that in my last outing I took
on some of the unintended consequences arising from the long-term
use of Beta SP and Dolby C in combination. Specifically, I looked
pretty hard at Dolby C, as a number of readers have written in to
suggest that it is a major contributor to the "bad audio" problems
that plague broadcast TV.
|
| (05.01.02) |
Bad Audio
and Some Unintended Consequences
These "bad audio" pieces I've been writing seem to have pinched
a collective nerve among our readership. I am getting a steady stream
of letters sharing numerous kind and, ah, not-so-kind thoughts about
the whole range of issues this sad topic engenders.
|
| (03.06.02) |
A Couch Potato
Rants About Video Quality
You gotta understand this. I'm an audio guy. When I'm doing audio,
I'm really pretty fussy, got lotsa critical standards, lotsa moaning
n groaning about noise n distortion, bandwidth, resolution,
compression artifacts, yada, yada, blah, blah, blah! |
| (02.06.02) |
Hi-Res Listening
Alert readers will recall that, about a year ago, I wrote a series
of pieces on high-resolution audio and its place in the scheme of
things. My position was that, especially for television, it wasnt
particularly important. |
| (01.09.02) |
TV Audio: Good
Is Not Good Enough
Two months ago we ranted about bad audio, goaded on by reader Bro
Duke, who wants the FCC to DO SOMETHING about it! Well, we got a fair
amount of mail, with some interesting horror stories. |
| (10.31.01) |
The Medias
Role on Sept. 11
By the time you read this, itll be early November and youll
be sick of reading about the sad events of Sept. 11. But as I write
this, its only been a week and Im still stuck in those
events Im sorry, but I cant write about anything
else quite yet.
|
| (10.03.01) |
THE GOOD, THE
BAD AND THE UGLY,The Brave New World
A couple of years back, I got an irate e-mail from a guy in northern
California who calls himself Bro Duke. He took me to task for worrying
about Surround Sound, saying, "As far as I'm concerned, the TV medium
hasn't even begun to manage mono properly.
|
| (09.05.01) |
The
Brave New World: Loudspeakers All Around!
As I noted last month, audio authority John Woram has said, "Audio
is a hallucination where the sufferer believes that he or she hears
music coming from a small wooden box."
|
| (08.08.01) |
The Brave New World:
Part 3
Ahh, the mysteries of the wooden box, aka the loudspeaker. There
are a couple of ways to consider loudspeakers. |
| (07.11.01) |
The
Brave New World:Control Room Design
I promised last month Id talk a little more about the
design of control rooms, as part of our inquiry into the care and
feeding of loudspeakers.
|
| (06.13.01) |
The
Brave New World: Part 2
Last month I ranted about the state of loudspeaker design and
performance, and promised you that Id devote several columns
to this worthy topic.
|
| (05.02.01) |
The Brave New World:
Loudspeakers
As I noted a couple months back, we tend to devalue the more familiar
and prosaic items in our technology toolkit. It seems to me that
were particularly indifferent to loudspeakers.
|
| (04.04.01) |
New Microphones at
NAB
An exciting array of new microphones and related technology will
be introduced at NAB this year.
|
| (02.07.01) |
How Microphones Have
Changed
After the end of World War II, the best microphones were the ones
used for live broadcasting. These were tube-amplified condenser
microphone designs intended for generic recording of medium-to-large
ensembles in reverberant spaces (recorded in mono often just
a single microphone).
|
| (01.24.01) |
The Brave Old New World
In all our gear-slut madness that sick, demented, trembling
need for the latest, coolest, bestest stuff on the market
which we all suffer from, especially around Christmas, we
tend to ignore the old, the traditional, the known stuff.
|
| (year 2001) |
High Resolution
Audio and Standards:
Uh-oh! Some Production Professionals Have Their Say
I know, I know! I promised you that I was done with resolution issues.
But as I wrapped up my rant, a couple of industry pros really got
on my case about some of the things I was saying.
|
| (10.31.00) |
Blind Testing in the Audio
Realm
Alert readers will recall that last month I began a discussion of
how we try to determine what it is that we humans can really hear.
|
| (10.31.00) |
The Difference Between
What You Hear and What You 'Hear'
Alert readers may recall that over the past several months I've
been plumbing the mysteries of audibility, with a particular eye
to the troubling confusions about how much resolution we can really
perceive in an audio signal. Very alert readers may have
noted that the issue is far from simple.
|
| (10.31.00) |
We Want Really Accurate
Recordings, Right? Or Do We?
We've been ranting about high-resolution recording for lo, these
many months. Nobody has questioned the desirability of high resolution.
We all agree that we need such resolution in order to make accurate
recordings. All I've been quibbling about is just how much resolution
we really need.
|
| (10.31.00) |
What Is It That
Were Hearing, Anyway?
For the last 2 months Ive been trying to offend everybody
by suggesting some things about the audibility of high-resolution
audio, and Ive taken the position that hi-res isnt very
audible, compared to 16-bit or even analog audio.
|