07.15.2010 02:00 PM
New York Broadcasters Band Against City’s Retrans Proposal
EmpireNight NEW YORK: Broadcasters in New York are fighting a proposed City Council resolution to ask Congress for a repeal of retransmission consent law. Executives from five local stations wrote to the City’s technology committee chairman, Dan Garodnick, asking that retrans be left alone.

“As broadcast stations serving New York City and the metropolitan area, we are deeply concerned about the resolutions and the impact the proposed changes to federal policy could have for New York City area residents. In addition, we wanted to present an alternative view to many of the facts being offered in support of the resolutions,” the executives said in the
letter to Garodnick.

It was signed by Dave Davis, president and general manager of WABC-TV; Michael Jack, president and general manager of WNBC-TV; Lew Leone, vice president and general manager of Fox’s WNYW-TV and MyNetwork’s WWOR-TV; Peter Dunn, president and general manager of WCBS-TV, and Ramon Pineda, senior vice president and regional director for Univision’s WXTV-TV and Telefutura’s WFUT/WFTY.
New York is the largest TV market in the United States. All the stations listed are owned and operated.

The letter explains that retransmission consent was established by Congress in 1992 as a means for local broadcasters to be compensated for their signals by cable and satellite operators.


“The revenues generated through retransmission consent are fundamental to the over-the-air broadcast system,” it said. “They allow local broadcasters to invest in newsgathering operations... They support the emergency services that alert
residents to dangerous weather, and provide life-saving information during public emergencies, as was demonstrated in the vital role New York City broadcasters played during the 9/11 attack.”

The five said retransmission was not “charity,” and that the local broadcast stations remained “by far the most-watched channels.”


“Cable companies already charge their subscribers a monthly fee for access to their local broadcast stations. Here in New York City, that monthly fee is typically around $18. Yet historically, cable companies have simply pocketed that fee as pure profit, paying nothing to local broadcasters,” they said.


The executives said there was no evidence to support the spirit of the City’s assertion that retrans is resulting in signals being pulled for “lengthy periods of time and cable bills rising for consumers.”


Only a handful of thousands of negotiations have resulted in service disruption, they said, and those were for a short time.


“Indeed, a recent analysis found that American households are about 10 times more likely to experience a complete cable system outage due to technical or weather-related reasons than to be deprived of a television channel because of a retransmission consent dispute,” they said.


They concluded by saying the FCC had reviewed retrans consent rules and recommended no changes in a report to Congress. The New York City Council is set to discuss the issue later today, although a vote is not expected.


The proposed resolution comes a day after a coterie of cable operators, interest groups and satellite TV providers banded together to alter retransmission rules. The
American Television Alliance is seeking a prohibition on signal-pulling during negotiations.

-- Deborah D. McAdams


Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 32-15-2010 04:32 PM Report Comment
They fought hard tooth and nail to force cable to carry their programming. I say I don't care about it. That $18 a month is just an access fee, not a content fee. that doesn't represent pure profit. Broadcasters are just being greedy. Their broadcast signal is free, why should cable ops be forced to pay for something they were forced to carry?
2.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 40-15-2010 05:40 PM Report Comment
Regarding the previous comment.. Cable companies aren't "forced to pay for things they're forced to carry". They ONLY pay broadcast stations that choose retrans consent status, and they're not required to carry those stations. Cable companies ARE required to carry stations that opt for must-carry status, however the cable companies PAY NOTHING to carry those stations. From the FCC.. "Since 1934, *broadcast stations that use the programming of other broadcast stations have been required to obtain the prior consent of the originating station*. This requirement has now been applied to cable systems because the absence of this requirement was distorting the video marketplace and threatening the future of over-the-air television broadcasting."




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB

Wall Street Communications /   Friday 06:11 PM
Primestream Products on Display at CAPER 2014:
Wall Street Communications /   Friday 04:13 PM
Wohler Products at CCW 2014

 
Featured Articles
Exhibitions & Events
Discover TV Technology