08.18.2011 02:20 PM
Local Lawmakers Line Up for LightSquared
Satellite1 WASHINGTON: LightSquared may be in the crosshairs of the GPS industry, but local lawmakers eager for broadband competition are calling for cooler heads. State lawmakers from across the country are urging the Federal Communications Commission to fix whatever’s broken between LightSquared and the global positioning systems. The GPS community opposes LightSquared’s proposed 4G LTE satellite-terrestrial broadband network because initial trials demonstrated GPS interference.

New York State Senate Majority Whip William J. Larkin, Jr., went to bat for LightSquared on behalf of first responders.

“As a retired Army officer… I realize how important our nation’s communications networks are in times of national emergencies,” he
wrote. “A communications network that can provide uninterrupted service during power outages and natural disasters would help strengthen our ability to protect and serve people in need.”

Jeffrey D. Klein, also a New York State Senator, urged the commission to resolve the GPS interference issues and launch the network.

“The idea of a fully integrated 4G LTE wholesale network that will help bring low-cost wireless broadband to the people of New York State is an exciting prospect,”
he said.

LightSquared is based in Reston, Va., and funded primarily through Harbinger Capital Partners, a New York-based private equity firm that’s invested at least $2.9 billion. Additional capital has been invested by UBS and JP Morgan. The company’s investors await final approval from the FCC so the network can be launched and begin generating revenue.

The FCC halted LightSquared after GPS interference became evident, and LightSquared responded with a modified launch plan it said would protect 99 percent of GPS receivers. The FCC opened a proceeding on the modified plan that’s generated nearly 3,300 comment since June, many from individual GPS users opposing LightSquared’s deployment.

Local and state lawmakers have different concerns, however. Minnesota State Sen. Ron Latz, for example, endorsed LightSquared to bridge the broadband income-access gap. Latz said he represented a mixed-income area of suburban Minneapolis.

“Households with incomes below $20,000 have access to broadband at less than one-third the rate of households over $75,000,” he said in his
filing. “Yet access to broadband is increasingly important for all Americans to actively participate in the workforce.”

Latz also asserted that LightSquared would provide some relief for rising cellphone costs.

“The consolidation of the cellphone market continues, with fewer options and less competition,” he said. “The application of LightSquared to provide enhanced nationwide broadband service and cellphone coverage is good news.”

Another Minnesota State Senator, Mike Parry, emphasized the need for broadband in his mostly rural district.

“My legislative district, which is located in southern Minnesota, includes two regional centers—Fairbault and Owatonna,”
he said. “These two communities are surrounded by small towns and farms. The lack of good telecommunications service is a problem for ambulance crew, state and county police and others that must respond swiftly to emergency situations.”

Parry said the paucity of broadband access in the area was also a “big barrier to economic growth.” He also said that since the interference problem lay with GPS devices rather than LightSquared, that GPS manufacturers ought to ‘take steps to remedy their devices.”

The mayor of Coachella, Calif., concurred with Parry’s view of broadband and small-town business development. His Honor Eduardo Garcia said LightSquared would make broadband more affordable to business owners in his community. He also emphasized the money being spent to launch the network.

“LightSquared is investing billions of dollars and creating thousands of jobs at a time when our economy sorely needs, help,”
he said. “The government should not stand in the way of this kind of investment.”

Nevada Democrats lent their support to LightSquared via a
filing from the party’s political director, Harriet Trudell. She cited LightSquared’s wholesale-only plan, which would give smaller broadband providers and entrée in the market. Trudell said she was aware of the GPS problem.

“These interference issues are resolvable with filtering technology added to GPS devices that mistakenly look inside LightSquared’s spectrum for signal,” she said, taking up LightSquared’s own defense against GPS opposition.

State lawmakers lining up with LightSquared included others from Missouri, New Mexico, California, Kansas, Arkansas, and possibly the whole of Minnesota’s House of Representatives. The Mayor of Middleton, N.J., did likewise, as did Winfred Stone of Go Pogy Bait and Tackle of Wintrhop, Mass., and Mitchell Balutski, a retired Captain of the Honolulu Fire Department. They are up against many hundreds of land surveyors, farmers, farm implement manufacturers, pilots, aircraft makers, GPS dealers, boaters, and others skeptical that the interference issue can be mitigated.

Concern about LightSquared and its potential impact has reached beyond U.S. borders as well.

“I am writing to express our deep concerns about the LightSquared system that is proposed for operation in frequencies immediately below the radionavigation-satellite service allocation at 1559-161OMHz,”
Heinz Zourek of the European Commission said. “This band is the core band used by global satellite navigation systems including GPS and you are no doubt aware that Europe is at the advanced planning stage for its own system, Galileo, which will be operational by 2014-15, and that will also use this RNSS allocation.

“Analysis carried out in Europe, including by our own technical partner the European Space Agency, has shown that transmissions from LightSquared base-stations do indeed have considerable potential to cause harmful interference to Galileo receivers operating in the United States….
We are confident that the process put in place by the FCC to deal with internal U.S. concerns about the threat to GPS reception will reach appropriate conclusions and that these will take into account our own concerns about reception of Galileo signals.

The FCC’s reply comment period on the LightSquared docket officially closed on Monday, but filings continue to pour in. The commission is expected to decide LightSquared’s fate next month. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski recently issued what amounted to an assurance that the agency would protect GPS in the event that LightSquared is approved.

~ Deborah D. McAdams

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 08-18-2011 02:58 PM Report Comment
It's great to hear both sides. Thanks for this thorough reporting!
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 08-18-2011 04:21 PM Report Comment
The problem with lightsquared is physics, Lightsquared LTE data communications signal destroys the GPS radio navigation signal. You can have GPS OR Lightsqared NOT BOTH. No amount of politics will change the physics. Lets not waste any time or money on lightsquared and actually solve problems.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 08-18-2011 04:39 PM Report Comment
The Lightsquared signal will diable all other cell phone carriers towers because they will jam the GPS clocks used in those towers. And the cell phone GPS will be jammed. You can have the competitive cell phone carrier environment we have now, Or you grant Lightsquared a monoploy. The nations power grid is timed by GPS so it will be dark and cold everywhere when Lightsquared turns on. That will reduce our dependance on foreign oil. I wouldn't fly in an airplane that would land within 15 miles of a lightsquared tower. The FAA air traffic control is based on GPS. The Coast Guard just shut down Loran relying on GPS for marine navigation and collision avoidance. No GPS car navigation system will work once Lightsquared turns on. Bye bye GPS, Lightsquared will send us into the stone age again.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 08-18-2011 05:05 PM Report Comment
Lightsquared's game is kinda like getting a building permit for a single car garage, then changing your mind and putting up a high rise office building. If they could operate at the originally approved power levels, there wouldn't be a problem.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Fri, 08-19-2011 01:43 PM Report Comment
From the head of the FCC to the politicians referenced in the article, there is a stinky aroma of payoff from the hedge fund billionaire. Follow the money. If "dark-cubed" is successful the cost of wireless internet will go down, but EVERYTHING else will increase - not to mention the unnecessary loss of life. Just an anonymous opinion. Oh, and for the record GPS users are NOT opposed to wireless 4G. Move to a different frequency and the problem solved! Duh.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Mon, 08-22-2011 10:10 AM Report Comment
I'd rather have GPS than a faster data connection. 3G works just fine. I can stream Netflix on 3G, but I can't navigate without GPS. In addition, I guarantee you there will be no "low-cost wireless broadband to the people". This is America, money grabbing large corps control our gov't.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Mon, 08-22-2011 12:26 PM Report Comment
I'd rather have GPS than a faster data connection. 3G works just fine. I can stream Netflix on 3G, but I can't navigate without GPS. In addition, I guarantee you there will be no "low-cost wireless broadband to the people". This is America, money grabbing large corps control our gov't.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Thu, 09-01-2011 01:43 AM Report Comment
I learned about LightSquared this evening. I cannot wait to watch the show that is about to takeplace.
Posted by: Deborah McAdams
Fri, 08-26-2011 09:43 AM Report Comment
Sampling comments submitted to FCC, one can almost predict a commenter's stance on the issue: Those who work in the statehouse, courthouse or schoolhouse want the LTE network. Those who work outdoors want GPS. Just another observation .. women with three part names want the network. - CHAS

Thursday 11:07 AM
The Best Deconstruction of a 4K Shoot You'll Ever Read
With higher resolutions and larger HD screens, wide shots using very wide lenses can be a problem because they allow viewers to see that infinity doesn’t quite resolve into perfect sharpness.

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology