Tom Butts / 08.28.2012 08:31AM
Court Upholds ivi.tv Shutdown
Internet streaming company vows to continue fight
NEW YORK— A federal appeals court this week affirmed a temporary injunction against ivi, Inc, a New York-based Internet streaming company that had been retransmitting broadcasters’ signals without their consent.
 
ivi.tv launched in 2010 in a handful of major cities in the U.S., carrying signals from ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, CW and PBS affiliates, for $5 a month, available via a downloadable app. Although the company had defined itself as a cable provider in the eyes of FCC regulations, broadcasters were able to get the service shut down in early 2011 with an injunction.
 
That decision was upheld this week by the U.S. Court of Appeals, which said that ivi.tv was not a cable provider and that its efforts to distribute broadcasters’ copyrighted programming threatened the television industry. 
 
The court said that unlike cable systems, which were created to help consumers access distant television signals, a service like ivi.tv does not fit within that definition. “Internet retransmission services are not seeking to address issues of reception and remote access to over the air television signals,” the court said, adding that “The Copyright Office has consistently concluded that Internet retransmission services are not cable systems.”
 
The court also affirmed the lower court’s conclusion that unauthorized retransmission of over the air TV signals could cause substantial harm to the industry.
 
“ivi’s actions harm plaintiff’s retransmissions and advertising revenues by substantially diminishing the value of their copyrighted programming,” the court said. “Indeed, ivi’s actions—streaming copyrighted works without permission—would drastically change the industry, to plaintiff’s detriment.” 
 
The NAB applauded the court’s decision. "This confirms that Congress never intended to allow Internet providers to retransmit broadcast programming without the consent of copyright owners," spokesman Dennis Wharton said. 
 
ivi vowed to fight on. "This is not the final chapter of this story," said company spokesman Hal Bringman. 


Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: charlesa
Tue, 08-28-2012 - 7:04PM Report Comment
we must still be living in the 40's when cable company's "were created to help consumers access distant television signals". What cable company fits that description today? The shortsighted broadcasters should have dealt with ivi, which are a dedicated group offering what the MODERN consumer wants...great pictures on their screen of choice, the computer, phone and tablet. Now they have to deal with the much more powerful Barry Diller and Aereo, now in NYC and probably soon in all major cities. In this era of high tech it's amazing we still cling to an antiquated format...broadcasting. I was an early user of ivi and found the format great and the people first rate.ivi type programing is inevitable.
2.
Posted by: Anonymous
Tue, 08-28-2012 - 5:45PM Report Comment
It's bad enough the broadcasters act like they own the airwaves. Broadcasters should be paying IVI for getting their programming and ads out to more people. When are these dinosaurs going to learn?




Thursday 4:50PM
NAB Says OET-69 Changes ‘Unlawful’ and ‘Flawed’
“NAB’s preliminary testing indicates that TV Study will effectively redefine and substantially reduce the coverage area of populations served for a significant number of television stations." ~ NAB


 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology