01.22.2009 11:25 AM
Not Ready for Prime Time!

Around 5.7 percent of U.S. TV households—6.5 million—aren’t ready for the DTV transition, according to new numbers from Nielsen. “Not ready,” in this case refers to complete reliance on over-the-air reception. E.g., 6.5 million homes would suddenly be stripped of TV. Last month, the figure was 7.8 million, so people are getting the message. At the current rate of preparation, however, about 5 million households will lose TV Feb. 17, the federal deadline for the digital transition.

Demographically, African American households (9.9 percent) are the least prepared for the transition, inching ahead of Hispanics (9.7 percent), who were least prepared last month. In terms of age, people over 55 were more ready than those 35 and younger. Among markets least prepared for the transition, Albuquerque, N.M. leads with a rate of more than 12 percent, followed by Dallas-Fort Worth, a market heavily reliant on over-the-air TV, at 10 percent. 

The table below lists designated market areas by those with the highest percentage of households unprepared for the DTV transition. Source: The Nielson Co.

 
Rank Market %Total %AA %Hisp %< 35 % 35-54 %55 +
1 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE 12.24 n/a 13.25 15.5 13.87 8.88
2 DALLAS-FT. WORTH 10.21 15.7 13.86 14.68 10.04 6.82
3 HOUSTON 9.95 14.12 17.01 17.07 8.08 7.79
4 TULSA 9.53 n/a n/a 16.19 12.61 3.04
5 PORTLAND, OR 9.08 n/a n/a 13.71 6.29 9.35
6 SALT LAKE CITY 8.58 n/a 5.47 8.14 11.23 5.83
7 MEMPHIS 8.53 12.62 n/a 7.69 8.27 9.24
8 AUSTIN 8.45 n/a 13.56 14.34 6.31 5.48
9 LOS ANGELES 7.66 11.21 11.2 9.49 8.79 4.81
10 SACRAMNTO-STKTON-MODESTO 7.33 5.04 7.12 7.39 7.36 7.26
11 PHOENIX (PRESCOTT) 7.31 n/a 18.16 16.43 6.56 3.1
12 JACKSONVILLE 7.02 14.67 n/a 8.65 8.21 4.95
13 DAYTON 6.88 8.56 n/a 16.83 3.19 4.88
14 GREENVLL-SPART-ASHEVLL-AND 6.69 15.3 n/a 19.34 5.08 2.66
15 INDIANAPOLIS 6.53 7.69 n/a 12.18 7.22 2.55
16 MILWAUKEE 6.43 13.65 n/a 2.52 8.95 5.25
17 SAN ANTONIO 6.2 n/a 9.72 5.41 7.31 5.36
18 RICHMOND-PETERSBURG 6.13 10.48 n/a 10.51 3.34 7.28
19 SAN DIEGO 5.94 n/a n/a 8.29 7.04 2.91
20 CLEVELAND-AKRON (CANTON) 5.91 15.78 n/a 10.51 7.01 2.62
21 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL 5.85 n/a n/a 9.72 5.11 4.38
22 KANSAS CITY 5.75 12.84 n/a 8.46 7.92 1.36
23 SEATTLE-TACOMA 5.67 n/a n/a 7.7 5.68 4.5
24 MIAMI-FT. LAUDERDALE 5.47 12.5 4.37 7.67 5.76 4.19
25 ST. LOUIS 5.26 9.95 n/a 7.32 5.33 3.96
26 CINCINNATI 5.21 12.5 n/a 7.98 2.92 6.28
27 SAN FRANCISCO-OAK-SAN JOSE 5.2 5.71 3.97 12.67 3.96 3.08
28 CHICAGO 5.18 8.67 8.75 6.46 4.84 4.75
29 LAS VEGAS 5.17 7.77 15.16 8.68 5.14 3.05
30 BIRMINGHAM (ANN AND TUSC) 4.86 6.67 n/a 3.31 5.45 5.12
31 CHARLOTTE 4.79 6.41 n/a 4.38 5.91 3.85
32 DENVER 4.75 n/a 7.88 7.61 4.71 2.9
33 LOUISVILLE 4.59 9.79 n/a 9.68 4.09 1.99
34 NASHVILLE 4.41 3.39 n/a 5.76 2.98 5.21
35 DETROIT 4.4 9.78 n/a 4 4.42 4.58
36 RALEIGH-DURHAM (FAYETVLLE) 4.38 9.49 n/a 5.3 3.63 4.62
37 NEW ORLEANS 4.35 8.33 n/a 8.62 4.58 1.72
38 COLUMBUS, OH 4.29 4.73 n/a 9.54 2.82 2.25
39 BUFFALO 4.27 7.92 n/a 4.32 3.78 4.72
40 TAMPA-ST. PETE (SARASOTA) 4.14 7.45 8.62 6.5 6.16 1.76
41 WASHINGTON, DC (HAGRSTWN) 4.08 3.23 2.38 4.84 4.45 3.2
42 ORLANDO-DAYTONA BCH-MELBRN 3.91 9.4 4.4 6.96 3.93 2.57
43 NORFOLK-PORTSMTH-NEWPT NWS 3.78 3.92 n/a 1.91 4.66 3.89
44 BALTIMORE 3.75 4.98 n/a 2.41 4.18 3.97
45 GREENSBORO-H.POINT-W.SALEM 3.42 3.24 n/a 6.14 3.76 1.61
46 KNOXVILLE 3.2 n/a n/a 1.71 5.73 1.71
47 PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD 3.2 n/a n/a 2.59 2.37 4.33
48 OKLAHOMA CITY 3.07 4.85 n/a 2.97 4.86 1.28
49 PITTSBURGH 3.05 3.37 n/a 6.77 3.09 1.68
50 FT. MYERS-NAPLES 2.98 n/a 5.65 4.83 6.2 0.47
51 WEST PALM BEACH-FT. PIERCE 2.67 7.69 6.52 9.44 2.14 0.96
52 NEW YORK 2.57 4.58 3.73 3.39 2.03 2.82
53 BOSTON (MANCHESTER) 2.25 9.09 n/a 0.92 2.64 2.4
54 PHILADELPHIA 2.1 5.08 5.3 4 1.4 1.94
55 ATLANTA 2.02 1.74 10.58 2.9 0.81 2.99
56 HARTFORD & NEW HAVEN 1.76 0.32 2.44 3.26 1.04 1.81



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

No Comments Found




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB


 
Featured Articles
Conference Updates
Technology in Focus
Discover TV Technology