01.22.2009 11:25 AM
Not Ready for Prime Time!

Around 5.7 percent of U.S. TV households—6.5 million—aren’t ready for the DTV transition, according to new numbers from Nielsen. “Not ready,” in this case refers to complete reliance on over-the-air reception. E.g., 6.5 million homes would suddenly be stripped of TV. Last month, the figure was 7.8 million, so people are getting the message. At the current rate of preparation, however, about 5 million households will lose TV Feb. 17, the federal deadline for the digital transition.

Demographically, African American households (9.9 percent) are the least prepared for the transition, inching ahead of Hispanics (9.7 percent), who were least prepared last month. In terms of age, people over 55 were more ready than those 35 and younger. Among markets least prepared for the transition, Albuquerque, N.M. leads with a rate of more than 12 percent, followed by Dallas-Fort Worth, a market heavily reliant on over-the-air TV, at 10 percent. 

The table below lists designated market areas by those with the highest percentage of households unprepared for the DTV transition. Source: The Nielson Co.

 
Rank Market %Total %AA %Hisp %< 35 % 35-54 %55 +
1 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE 12.24 n/a 13.25 15.5 13.87 8.88
2 DALLAS-FT. WORTH 10.21 15.7 13.86 14.68 10.04 6.82
3 HOUSTON 9.95 14.12 17.01 17.07 8.08 7.79
4 TULSA 9.53 n/a n/a 16.19 12.61 3.04
5 PORTLAND, OR 9.08 n/a n/a 13.71 6.29 9.35
6 SALT LAKE CITY 8.58 n/a 5.47 8.14 11.23 5.83
7 MEMPHIS 8.53 12.62 n/a 7.69 8.27 9.24
8 AUSTIN 8.45 n/a 13.56 14.34 6.31 5.48
9 LOS ANGELES 7.66 11.21 11.2 9.49 8.79 4.81
10 SACRAMNTO-STKTON-MODESTO 7.33 5.04 7.12 7.39 7.36 7.26
11 PHOENIX (PRESCOTT) 7.31 n/a 18.16 16.43 6.56 3.1
12 JACKSONVILLE 7.02 14.67 n/a 8.65 8.21 4.95
13 DAYTON 6.88 8.56 n/a 16.83 3.19 4.88
14 GREENVLL-SPART-ASHEVLL-AND 6.69 15.3 n/a 19.34 5.08 2.66
15 INDIANAPOLIS 6.53 7.69 n/a 12.18 7.22 2.55
16 MILWAUKEE 6.43 13.65 n/a 2.52 8.95 5.25
17 SAN ANTONIO 6.2 n/a 9.72 5.41 7.31 5.36
18 RICHMOND-PETERSBURG 6.13 10.48 n/a 10.51 3.34 7.28
19 SAN DIEGO 5.94 n/a n/a 8.29 7.04 2.91
20 CLEVELAND-AKRON (CANTON) 5.91 15.78 n/a 10.51 7.01 2.62
21 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL 5.85 n/a n/a 9.72 5.11 4.38
22 KANSAS CITY 5.75 12.84 n/a 8.46 7.92 1.36
23 SEATTLE-TACOMA 5.67 n/a n/a 7.7 5.68 4.5
24 MIAMI-FT. LAUDERDALE 5.47 12.5 4.37 7.67 5.76 4.19
25 ST. LOUIS 5.26 9.95 n/a 7.32 5.33 3.96
26 CINCINNATI 5.21 12.5 n/a 7.98 2.92 6.28
27 SAN FRANCISCO-OAK-SAN JOSE 5.2 5.71 3.97 12.67 3.96 3.08
28 CHICAGO 5.18 8.67 8.75 6.46 4.84 4.75
29 LAS VEGAS 5.17 7.77 15.16 8.68 5.14 3.05
30 BIRMINGHAM (ANN AND TUSC) 4.86 6.67 n/a 3.31 5.45 5.12
31 CHARLOTTE 4.79 6.41 n/a 4.38 5.91 3.85
32 DENVER 4.75 n/a 7.88 7.61 4.71 2.9
33 LOUISVILLE 4.59 9.79 n/a 9.68 4.09 1.99
34 NASHVILLE 4.41 3.39 n/a 5.76 2.98 5.21
35 DETROIT 4.4 9.78 n/a 4 4.42 4.58
36 RALEIGH-DURHAM (FAYETVLLE) 4.38 9.49 n/a 5.3 3.63 4.62
37 NEW ORLEANS 4.35 8.33 n/a 8.62 4.58 1.72
38 COLUMBUS, OH 4.29 4.73 n/a 9.54 2.82 2.25
39 BUFFALO 4.27 7.92 n/a 4.32 3.78 4.72
40 TAMPA-ST. PETE (SARASOTA) 4.14 7.45 8.62 6.5 6.16 1.76
41 WASHINGTON, DC (HAGRSTWN) 4.08 3.23 2.38 4.84 4.45 3.2
42 ORLANDO-DAYTONA BCH-MELBRN 3.91 9.4 4.4 6.96 3.93 2.57
43 NORFOLK-PORTSMTH-NEWPT NWS 3.78 3.92 n/a 1.91 4.66 3.89
44 BALTIMORE 3.75 4.98 n/a 2.41 4.18 3.97
45 GREENSBORO-H.POINT-W.SALEM 3.42 3.24 n/a 6.14 3.76 1.61
46 KNOXVILLE 3.2 n/a n/a 1.71 5.73 1.71
47 PROVIDENCE-NEW BEDFORD 3.2 n/a n/a 2.59 2.37 4.33
48 OKLAHOMA CITY 3.07 4.85 n/a 2.97 4.86 1.28
49 PITTSBURGH 3.05 3.37 n/a 6.77 3.09 1.68
50 FT. MYERS-NAPLES 2.98 n/a 5.65 4.83 6.2 0.47
51 WEST PALM BEACH-FT. PIERCE 2.67 7.69 6.52 9.44 2.14 0.96
52 NEW YORK 2.57 4.58 3.73 3.39 2.03 2.82
53 BOSTON (MANCHESTER) 2.25 9.09 n/a 0.92 2.64 2.4
54 PHILADELPHIA 2.1 5.08 5.3 4 1.4 1.94
55 ATLANTA 2.02 1.74 10.58 2.9 0.81 2.99
56 HARTFORD & NEW HAVEN 1.76 0.32 2.44 3.26 1.04 1.81



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

No Comments Found




Tuesday 06:00 AM
Eleven FCC Scenarios for The 600 MHz Band Plan
I suspect that the estimated $44 billion of auction proceeds do not take into account the fact that some spectrum the FCC will buy cannot be resold because it must be used as guard intervals in the 600 MHz band plan.~ Charles W. Rhodes

Zazil Media Group /   Thursday 11:07 AM
NAB 2015 Preview: Dalet Spearheads the Facility of the Future
Wall Street Communications /   Thursday 07:36 PM
Digital Alert Systems 2015 NAB Show Preview

 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology