MULTIPLE CITIES -- One of the more interesting tools in the 21st century journalist’s kit is the
digital single lens reflex camera, or more simply, the DSLR. It arrived on the
scene a relatively short time ago, but has already been around long enough to
evoke a love/hate relationship among users.
“The images are fabulous, really
excellent pictures,” said Art Donahue (pictured below, right),
an editor and producer at WCVB in
Boston who has been shooting news
footage for the past 40 years. “Everyone
wants the shallow depth of field
that DSLRs offer, and it works so well
in low-light situations. With the fullframe
sensor, you’re downsampling
to HD. The noise virtually disappears
and you’re able to shoot in low-light
situations that you couldn’t do with
a standard 2/3-inch imager—this is a
huge, huge advantage.”
Carl Mrozek, an independent
shooter based in Buffalo, N.Y.,
acknowledged that DSLRs provide
great images, but getting good audio is
more challenging. “It’s really hard to
monitor audio properly, even with an
outboard adapter,” Mrozek said. “Also,
the audio adapters make the DSLR
package clunky and harder to handle.
It takes a lot of adjustment to use a
DSLR for shooting video.”
VIDEO ON A BUDGET
No one knows for sure exactly why
camera manufacturers began including
a “video” mode on some of their
digital models, or who actually used
the feature to capture content aired on
television. However, in the span of a
few years, video capability has become
more or less universal with DSLRs,
and a lot of people are taking advantage
of it.
“I think it all started with still photographers
who wanted to grab some
video from time to time,” Mrozek said.
“Rather than go out and buy a $5,000
or $10,000 video camera, why not just
use the DSLR?”
Jim Crawford, president of Frezzi
Energy Systems, and one of several
suppliers of DSLR shooting rigs, said
Nikon may have been the first kid
on the block with a production video
mode on a still camera, but that now,
“everybody is into it.” Crawford is
based in the New York City area and
interfaces with many area shooters on
a regular basis.
“While the DSLR with video has
been out for some time, it’s only been
adopted by TV people in the last two
years or so,” he said. “You don’t see
it replacing shoulder-mount camcorders
in its present form. When
you’re a news guy, you cannot make
a mistake—you really can’t fumble
around looking for the on/off switch.
What I’m seeing right now is its use
in providing part of the production
footage that’s intercut with that from
conventional cameras. You do see a lot
of specialty people using DSLRs, but it’s
not in mainstream news just yet.”
Mrozek thinks that DSLR technology
does have a place in some newsgathering
applications, though.
“It would be good for special applications
such as war-zone shooting,
where a larger camera would be too
conspicuous. DSLRs have obvious advantages
for news applications involving
stealth and traveling light. Getting
a DSLR through customs shouldn’t
be a problem either, where carrying a
conventional video camera might. The
ability to hide recording media is good
too—the small size allows you to keep
the important stuff safe.”
CAMCORDERS STAY ON SHELF
Chuck Gloman, who is chair of De-
Sales University’s TV and Film department,
also sees a bright future for the
DSLR in newsgathering applications.
His school offers a four-year bachelor
of arts degree in television and film,
and he has found that the current wave
of students have all but abandoned
conventional camcorders.
“The shift occurred about two years
ago,” Gloman said. “Our students are
using DSLRs exclusively in their work.
The camcorders are gathering dust.
We’ve had two graduating classes go
out into the world, and DSLRs are all
they’re using. They cost less, produce
great pictures and offer a ‘film look’
because the glass is better. I think that
eventually it will be universally accepted
for news work.”
Gloman, however, does agree that
the DSLR comes with a few negatives.
“One drawback is that the sensor
overheats in 20 minutes or so. You
have to let it rest, as the camera shuts
itself down, so it’s not really good
right now for long-form content capture.
Another drawback for me is that
I wear bifocals and I can’t focus that
well. I really have to use an external
monitor. Also, you’re really holding a
still camera, so it doesn’t rest on your
shoulder or fit the palm of your hand
like a camcorder. This isn’t going to
change.”
Another educator, Geoff Poister,
who’s a member of Boston University’s
Film and Television faculty, also
sees a place for the DSLR in TV news.
“People don’t know you’re shooting
video—they think you’re shooting
stills,” Poister said. “These cameras let
you get away with it. You look like a
tourist and are not likely to be stopped
as a professional shooter might. Plus
the images are great—high-definition,
which can be downscaled.”
On the negative side, Poister has
also encountered the sensor overheating
and audio drawbacks associated
with DSLRs, but has learned to overcome
these.
“The sensor can heat if you run
continuously and the weather is
warm,” he said. “You get an overheat
warning and eventually, it will shut
off. Then you have to wait 10 minutes
or so for it to cool before you can start
recording again. I don’t see it as a serious
problem in most applications. In
shooting documentaries I frequently
stop and start the camera anyway.
“For me, audio is the real problem,
but it’s not insurmountable. Several
companies make attachments that
mount on the bottom of the camera
and let you plug in an XLR microphone,
or you can use a separate
recorder. For $150 or $200, you can
get a nice recorder and match up the
sound and video later. Tascam makes
some nice units for this purpose.”
Although the jury is still out, most
DSLR video users contacted tended to
agree that while several items—including
audio, sensor overheating, external
rig requirements, and control location—
will have to be addressed before
the camera format goes mainstream in
TV news, it is a useful tool.
“Yes, it takes some adjusting to use
a DSLR for video,” Mrozek said. “Yet
people are even using iPhones and
the like for shooting video now. Who
knows where it’s going to end up? We
may all be shooting with totally different
types of cameras someday. There
is no ‘one size fits all’ for anything
anymore. DSLRs are definitely an
important new addition to the pro
videographer’s toolbox, especially in
situations where size matters, as does
the replacement cost [when] the camera
is at risk.”