Doug Lung /
04.26.2013 01:54 PM
FCC TV Application ‘Freeze’ Might Have Triggered Dielectric’s Closing
Company could get second life
In my NAB Show Observations, I discussed the impact of the FCC “freeze” on processing some TV broadcast applications, writing “While there may be a short-term boost in sales from stations with construction permits to build out their facilities while they still can (even if they may not be protected in the repacking), reduced U.S. equipment sales is bound to put a strain on TV broadcast transmitter, filter and antenna manufacturers and their employees” and added, “some manufacturers may not survive to meet what could be a huge demand for transmitters, filters and antennas in three years.”

While I saw problems in the industry, I was surprised to receive several emails last Friday about SPX shutting down Dielectric. Deborah McAdams describes the event and the potential impact in Dielectric Demise Raises Repacking Alarm.

This week I was able to gather a clearer picture of what's going on with Dielectric, and also the good news for the many stations using Dielectric antennas that SPX is committed to honoring all Dielectric warranties, although it isn't clear how they would do this if manufacturing is shut down. Even better news is there is a very good chance Dielectric products will continue to be available, but possibly under another name.

When SPX announced the closing of Dielectric, it appears they felt broadcasting was a dead-end business and Dielectric had no future. No one would be interested in the business. Apparently, though, I was not the only one emailing other antenna company execs suggesting they might consider picking up Dielectric's intellectual property (IP) for antennas, transmission line and filters. After talking with numerous people in the industry, it appears that not only direct competitors, but also at least one transmitter company is expressing interest in Dielectric's IP and it also appears SPX is willing to sell the IP, but only as a whole--not as individual product lines. Such a deal would be likely to include liability for existing installations, so it might be difficult for a smaller company to acquire Dielectric's IP.

Some of the companies with the resources to make a deal with SPX and continue manufacturing Dielectric products include ERI, Jampro and RFS. It would be ironic if Harris, now newly independent, were to take over the Dielectric line after selling Dielectric its antenna line 13 years ago. I don't have specific information confirming any of these companies are considering buying the Dielectric IP, but I think most would agree they are the obvious choices. I've heard that some of Dielectric's customers may be interested in the IP, but have no additional information.

One thing is clear--it's too early to mourn Dielectric. The response from customers and competitors to last Friday's announcement indicates the company still has value. Of course, Dielectric's value is not only its IP, but the engineers and people on the manufacturing floor that make the products. The best news would be that not only Dielectric's products continue to be available and supported, but also that the people that made and sold these products are still involved with them. During the next few weeks we should learn what going to happen to the Raymond, Maine facility--SPX is not selling the pressurization/radio-detection business that's located there (although that element probably would not be difficult to move), and local news reports indicate the town of Raymond wants to maintain the property for business instead of high-end residential purposes. Stay tuned.



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Anonymous
Fri, 10-26-2013 08:10 PM Report Comment
What about the "new" Comark ?




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB

Sue Sillitoe, White Noise PR /   Monday 10:45 AM
100 Free DPA Microphones – How Do You Wear Yours?

 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology