homeIndexpage


Study: 8.5 Million Households Face Poor DTV Reception

 Permanent link
Even a $40 converter-box coupon can’t get TV where there’s an inadequate signal, and a new study by Centris Inc. estimates that 8.5 million households primarily reliant on over-the-air TV will experience some trouble with TV reception.

That’s 58 percent of all households primarily reliant on over-the-air TV. The total figure is a decline from Centris’ early 2008 estimate of 9.2 million.

That study was criticized at the time by many broadcasters on several methodological fronts, as outlined here by TV Technology columnist Doug Lung.

At that time, David Donovan, president of the Association for Maximum Service Television (MSTV) also criticized the Centris study. "It is simply wrong to suggest that DTV service will not be available in areas outside of 30 miles from a DTV broadcast tower," he said, referring to one of the study’s assumptions. Donovan was not immediately available for further comment.

Centris said its latest study—pitched as a report of marketing opportunities related to the DTV transition—“means that a large number of TV viewers will require additional options other than the primary converter box program to continue receiving adequate signals.”

By “other options,” Centris is referring to new antennas as well as subscription TV. For cable providers, new customers might also want voice and broadband services, said Centris President Bill Beaumont.

“Retailers that offer both sales and installation of antenna and other needed equipment may also benefit from selective households wishing to retain OTA reception,” Beaumont said.

Centris estimates that 33.8 million homes that will be affected by the DTV conversion—14.6 million that use on-air analog signals as their primary source of TV, and another 19.2 million with both over-the-air and pay television.

Of the 14.6 million primary OTA households, Centris estimates approximately 6.1 million (42 percent) should be able to receive TV if they purchased and correctly install a converter box.

Centris is selling the complete report for $2,500.

Posted by Sanjay Talwani at 01/15/2009 12:46:49 PM | 


I've tried the best channel master antenna, with the
best preamp I can find, and I still can't get some stations. I have sent e-mails, and called local stations just trying to find out if they are going to change channels when the conversion takes place, and they won't respond. As of now I no longer watch local tv. There is no reason to bother. I haven't watched local except for a occasional program in months, and don't miss it.I think local has just lost. Now can we sell all the frequency's and put the money to some other stupid government project.
Posted by: Bill Houston ( Email: ) at 1/18/2009 10:23 AM


I think it would be wise for the government to let PBS affiliates broadcast analog and digital signals for one or two more years. The other network and indie stations would go just digital as scheduled. It would offer some television to those without adequate digital signals have some access and the other viewers that have yet to finish their conversion
Posted by: Roger Sajak ( Email: ) at 1/20/2009 6:45 PM


We've been battling the new dtv signals for nearly a year now-one station made the switch early due to analog transmitter failure. Our reception is AWFUL, even with a big roof-top antenna, and we only live about 15-20 miles from the stations. Cable's not an option here and satelite won't work due to tree cover. I really feel awful for those who are more rural and less well off. We're doing them a huge disservice.
Posted by: Sandy ( Email: | Visit ) at 2/14/2009 2:12 PM


I have been trying to get things set up for the DTV transition for over a year. I am using the Samsung "260" receiver because the "coupon eligible" boxes do not work good enough! Cable is not available where we live, and I will not pay for Sattelite as I am on a fixed income. I will do without, but feel betrayed by the whole situation. I have individual Yagi's for Lancaster
(ch 8) and am using an 8 bay Uhf with a CM-7777 preamp at the antenna's to preserve the weak signals I do receive at the antenna's. From what I am seeing, it appears that someone screwed up by at least -6db on the hi VHF transmitted signals, and possibly more on the UHF signals here in central Pennsylvania. It appears that I will have no Fox network and possibly no NBC network after June. The CW network cut on February, and on a seperate antenna setup, the signal drops out so badly, it is unwatchable over
80% of the time. It appears as if the persons that did the engineering numbers did not live in the "Real World" I have experimented with UHF since the mid 1950's when the first stations came on the air, and was a Cellular RF Engineer in Eastern Pa from the Beginning in 1985. I have done everything I know to optomize my installations here, so it will be a loss in June.
So much for the Public Trust of OTA TV.
Posted by: Ron Etzweiler ( Email: ) at 3/23/2009 9:40 PM


We live in northeast Texas, about 45 miles from our local stations' broadcast towers. Analog TV provided almost excellent signal strength, but this digital crap is just that...CRAP! We had to buy 2 converter boxes and now we're trying to find better indoor antennas so that the channels we watch on a regular basis will come in well enough to keep from being pixelized. We live in an apartment, so cable isn't an option and satellite is extremely expensive for those of us on fixed incomes. If a new antenna doesn't fix the problem, then we'll be stuck with downloading and watching episodes of our favorite shows online. Did any government bureaucrat think before passing this "gem" of a bill?
Posted by: Karla ( Email: ) at 4/28/2009 12:30 AM


This digital TV is the worst thing they could have done. They kept saying how it would be so much better. What good is TV when it either looses signal and goes blank or just freezes every 2 seconds. You can't watch TV like that. I am in new York city, not in a rural area at all and it is still horrible!!! I haven't watched much TV since the switch. Maybe we can protest this??
Posted by: Elizabeth ( Email: ) at 6/20/2009 3:00 AM


I am unable to get ABC or CBS off air with a digital TV and a $85 Terk antenna since the switch. I am finding many people with the same problem. I have spoken to the FCC agents but nothing improves. Is this a class action suit ripe for the taking by any ambitious attorney? I will be the first to sign the complaint! How much money do I have to throw at this without success-I wish I knew how to proceed and who to proceed against.
Posted by: Susan ( Email: ) at 6/30/2009 8:39 PM


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment



by Sanjay Talwani

Even a $40 converter-box coupon can’t get TV where there’s an inadequate signal.
Categories: (7) Comments