10.08.2004 08:00 AM
Court rules sampling may violate copyright law at the molecular level

A Federal court in Cincinnati has ruled that even samples of pre-existing songs that have been significantly manipulated via effects such as pitch change, time-shifting, and looping are still protected by existing copyright laws.

Lower courts had already ruled that artists must pay when they sample another artist's work. However, it has been legal to use snippets and fragments of that work so long as they were not identifiable with the original artist and recording. The new ruling removes that distinction.

The case, stemming from one of more than 800 filed in Nashville on the matter, addresses sampling at the SR (sound recording) copyright rather than at the level of the composition (song copyright).

For more information, visit www.riaa.com

Back to the top

Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

No Comments Found

Tuesday 03:07 PM
WMUR-TV Says FAA Drone Rules Preclude ENG
The FAA’s current rules and proposed ban on flight over people, requirement of visual line of sight and restriction on nighttime flying, effectively prohibit broadcasters from using UAS for newsgathering. ~ WMUR-TV General Manager Jeff Bartlett

Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology