Putting systems
and operations in
place to ensure
compliance with the
CALM Act involves having
a plan; understanding
your workflows;
installing the necessary
loudness meters that
implement the algorithm
specified by ITUR
BS.1770; developing operational procedures;
and following the “golden rule” for
the ATSC transmission system—average
loudness must equal the dialnorm metadata
value that you transmit.
In this column we’re going to tie up
some loose ends.
Previously we covered operational procedures
for live sound mixing, with examples
from NBCUniversal. Let’s continue
now with a few words about post production
and ingest.
MONITORING LEVELS
At NBCU, post-production editors isolate
dialog on their timelines and set the
fader on the edit console so that normal
spoken dialog reads –24 LKFS.
“For news, this is done during interviews
or voice-overs,” said Jim Starzynski,
director and principal audio engineer for
NBCUniversal Advanced Engineering, and
chairperson of the Advanced Television
Systems Committee (ATSC) technical subgroup
S6-3 on digital television loudness.
“Intros are not typically used as talent
tends to project abnormally louder during
these elements.”
Once the –24 LKFS anchor loudness is
achieved, the monitoring level control is
set and not changed for the duration of the
project.
“The editor now sets the remaining
dialog and establishes the ratio between
dialog, music and effects by ear,” Starzynski
said. “At this point, the loudness meter
is used as a reference to confirm what the
editor is hearing. This is a simple practice
that’s easy to accomplish, and that yields
excellent results by leveraging the best
judge of audio loudness, the human hearing
system.”
For ingest, NBCU follows procedures
outlined in the ATSC A/85 recommendations
for checking commercial and promo
content for loudness. Namely, an average
reading is taken of all elements of the content,
not just the dialog, for the entire duration
of the content.
“This is done by synchronizing the resetstart-
pause of a loudness meter running in
infinite mode, with the pause-play-pause of
the whole spot,” Starzynski said. “The meter
and the content run simultaneously, and
when the meter is paused at the end of the
spot, the resultant numeric
value is the precise average
loudness of that piece of
content.”
As discussed previously,
reference monitoring levels
are determined by the
size of the audio control or
editing room, with smaller
rooms operating at a lower
level. The ATSC A/85 PDF
document provides links
to audio test signals, which
can be used to set up reference
levels per the given instructions. I
was able to play the signals on my computer,
but wasn’t able to download the
actual files to save them for later use.
REFERENCE MONITORING LEVELS
If you experience the same problem,
here is the direct link to an HTML page
with links to the individual files: www.atsc.org/refs/a85. (Thanks to Jim Starzynski
for helping to obtain this information.)
 |
| Jim Starzynski, director and principal audio engineer for
NBCUniversal Advanced Engineering, and
chairperson of the Advanced Television
Systems Committee technical subgroup
S6-3 on digital television loudness. |
The files are: a 440 Hz sine wave tone
at –20 dB FS recorded on the left channel
of a stereo file; 500 Hz to 2 kHz band limited
pink noise at –20 dB FS recorded on
the left channel of a stereo file; a speech
recording, first of a male speaker, then a
female, that has been adjusted in level so
that it measures –24 LKFS per the ITU-R
BS.1770 standard; and the final test signal,
low-frequency pink noise.
In live sound mixing and post-production
editing, the audio mixers are expected
to be the best judge of loudness, while
creatively developing their mix to take
advantage of the dynamic range available
to digital television. That means that the
acoustics of their mixing rooms shouldn’t
interfere with that process.
If 5.1 wasn’t enough of an incentive to
evaluate and perhaps update the acoustics
and monitoring loudspeaker systems
of your audio control and edit rooms,
then perhaps the CALM Act will provide
the big push.
LEARNING CURVE
It’s hoped that these articles about developing
systems to implement
the CALM Act have
proved useful. The examples
cited from the experiences at
NBCUniversal should show
that setting up procedures
and practices for measuring
and monitoring loudness are
fairly straightforward.
Sure it will take some time
to develop your own strategies
as you work through the
processes, and, like anything
new, learning to read loudness
will take some training and practice.
But as NBCU discovered, the learning
curve was not a steep one.
And, as ITU-R BS.1770 is an international
standard, mixing to audio levels
based on loudness should now track
across borders much more easily. No
more guessing how zero VU translates to
a particular PPM reading.
Establishing and sticking to your company’s
standard loudness target value, and
setting dialnorm to that value on your
AC-3 encoder, should ultimately reduce,
and hopefully eliminate, viewers’ complaints
about wide variations in loudness;
keep you in compliance with the CALM
Act; and achieve some of the objectives
of the AC-3 system.
As the ATSC A/85 document states, the
AC-3 system is “intended to provide: 1) a
consistent dialog loudness between programs,
and 2) to allow individual listeners
to reduce the dynamic range excursions
around this common loudness level if
they so desire.”
Good luck in your endeavors.
Mary C. Gruszka is a systems design
engineer, project manager, consultant
and writer based in the New York metro
area. She can be reached via TV Technology.