Print
Email
Deborah D. McAdams / 07.22.2010 12:00PM
Lawmakers Urge FCC to Revisit Retransmission
WASHINGTON: Another
Washington, D.C. lawmaker has asked FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski to revisit
retransmission consent rules as a fight brews between two TV powerhouses. The
retrans agreement between Time Warner Cable and Disney expires Sept. 2, and the
two are already taking shots.
Meanwhile, Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) wrote a letter to Genachowski dated July 19,
requesting a review. Blunt says he’s not choosing horses, but he does want a race.
“To be clear, we are not choosing sides in this matter nor are we advocating a
specific resolution,” he wrote. “To the contrary: After further study, the
commission might very well conclude that no changes to the current system are
warranted. Hence, we advocate nothing more than that the commission, as the
agency of primary jurisdiction, open a formal proceeding on retransmission
consent and develop a complete record, with the goal of helping all concerned
parties understand how this subject might be most productively addressed and
the public interest most effectively served, be it through maintaining or
altering the status quo.”
Retransmission rules allow broadcasters to negotiate for fees from cable and
satellite operators for carriage of their signals. Since carriers charge for
broadcast signals, broadcasters contend they are due compensation. Carriers
argue that broadcasters have too much power in negotiations because they can
pull signals, and carriers are prohibited from replacing them with
out-of-market stations.
On March 9, Time Warner Cable, Cablevision, DirecTV, Dish, Charter, Public
Knowledge, and several other entities filed a
joint petition
with the FCC, asking for retrans reform. The resulting docket, No. 10-71,
generated at least 165 responses, and though the final reply comment period
closed June 3, ex parte filings continue. The majority of ex parte filings are
from cable companies, though one dated July 14 is from the chairman of the New
York City Council’s Committee on Technology, Daniel Garodnick. He urged Genachowski
to take up reform. The chairman’s been reluctant to do so. A senior Genachowski
advisor attending a cable convention in May said broadcasters were not acting
in bad faith by asking for more money, according to the Los
Angeles Times.
Blunt is at least the fourth lawmaker to officially weigh in. Rep. Kurt
Schrader (D-Ore.) filed
comments
in May indicating sympathy for the pay TV carriers. They want broadcasters
prohibited from pulling signals when retrans contracts expire during
contentious negotiations. The proposal is being referred to as the “standstill
provision.”
“I have been hearing from many of my state’s smaller operators that they have a
high cost of doing business and are... paying significantly high rates for
programming,” Schrader wrote. “It is my understanding that many of these
smaller operators may be at a disadvantage because they negotiate with larger
content companies who have considerable leverage.”
Rep. Phil Hare (D-Ill.) expressed similar sentiments in his
filing.
“Some of Illinois’ smaller cable operators are paying significantly higher
rates for programming than larger operators,” he wrote. “Not seeing any legitimate
economic justification for the vast differences in rates charged, I am
concerned that my constituents are being placed at a disadvantage simply
because they live in rural areas.... I am concerned that federal rules and
regulations have not been able to keep up with the rapidly changing
video-programming market which may be to blame for
the apparent price discrimination.”
Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) sided with broadcasters.
“I am very concerned by the potential harm that the so-called ‘standstill provision’
coupled with the imposition of government arbitration is likely to cause,” he
wrote.
“Instituting a standstill would tilt the negotiating leverage entirely in the
direction of the operator.”
The FCC has not yet placed retransmission on its agenda. The histrionics are
escalating in the meantime. Time Warner Cable is leading the charge to reform
retrans, especially now that Comcast is angling for regulatory approval of its
NBCU takeover. (Comcast is conspicuously absent from the recently formed
American Television Alliance,
an industry consortium created to push retrans reform.) Comcast quietly reached
retrans agreements earlier this month with Fox, CBS and ABC.
TWC, meanwhile, is trading brickbats with Disney. The two have used the FCC’s
retransmission docket to argue data points, particularly how cable rates are
affected by programming costs--and by extension, retransmission. (
See “Disney
Takes Aim at TWC’s Retransmission-Consent Analysis at the FCC” by Mike
Reynolds of Multichannel News.)
Retransmission negotiations often are accompanied by consumer smear campaigns
where both parties try to vilify the other. Both Disney and TWC have started ad
campaigns, and Disney has put up a Web site,
IHaveChoices.com,
specifically for the TWC negotiations.
“Our current agreements with Time Warner Cable to carry the ESPN Networks
and--in certain markets--ABC stations, will expire on Sept. 2, 2010,” the site
states. “The two companies are now in active negotiations to reach agreement
before that date. It is in the best interests of consumers, as well as both
companies, for us to successfully conclude these negotiations before the
deadline to avoid interrupting service to Time Warner Cable subscribers. That
is our goal.”
--
Deborah
D. McAdams
Print
Email
Sunday 12:00AM
EBU Pushes Hybrid Broadcast/Broadband TV
“Underlying this co-operation is the shared conviction that... only a flexible, cross-border approach will make it happen quickly.” ~ Ingrid Deltenre