Print
Email
/ 03.25.2011 12:00AM
Fox Station Fined $4,000 for Omission of Sponsorship ID
WASHINGTON: A Fox-owned TV station in Minneapolis has been
fined $4,000 for failing to identify the sponsor of a Video News Release. The
Federal Communications Commission today released a notice that it levied the
fine against KMSP-TV for willful violation of its VNR rules during a June 19,
2006 newscast. The broadcast included a segment on convertibles that
incorporated a VNR from General Motors.
“The recording of the broadcast at issue showed approximately 12 different
shots of the three convertibles mentioned in the script: the Pontiac Solstice,
the Saturn Sky, and the Pontiac G6. All are General Motors cars. No other
convertibles or other cars were either shown or mentioned,” the FCC notice
states.
The incident was brought to the FCC’s attention by Free Press and the Center
for Media and Democracy, which filed a complaint against KMSP. The FCC
inquired, and the station acknowledged that it aired the VNR, which it said was
distributed through Fox News Edge, the Fox affiliate news service. Fox contended
that the VNR needed “no sponsorship identification announcement” because
no one at the station received consideration for air time. It argued that the
use of the VNR was no different from reliance on press releases, which do not
require sponsorship announcements. Fox said FCC’s inquiry was “impermissible
encroachment” on its “editorial discretion.”
FCC rules regarding VNRs provide that any material aired for which money,
service or consideration of any type is supplied directly or
indirectly--requires a sponsorship identification. The same goes for material
containing “an identification of any person, product service, trademark or
brand name beyond an identification reasonably related to the use of such
service or property on the broadcast,” even if no payment is involved.
The two people featured in the General Motors VNR were the car company’s head
of product development, and an editor from “Automobile Magazine” saying: “Does
General Motors have the ability to make cars people want? Yes, they do. It’s
absolutely clear. This is the key to their survival and on top of that, I have
seen, as many journalists have, cars that are scheduled for the next couple of
years, and I’ll tell you that if those cars were on the road right now today, I
don’t think they’d be in this jam at all.”
This commentary, the FCC said, “was disproportionate to the subject matter of
the program segment.”
Fox argued that the FCC’s action violated its First Amendment rights and would
cause broadcasters to self-censor. The commission said it wasn’t restricting
speech, nor the use of VNRs, but simply requiring public disclosure of
advertiser-supplied material used in newscasts. Its ID rules are “grounded in
the principle that listeners and viewers are entitled to know who seeks to
persuade them,” the FCC said.
Fox can either pay the $4,000 or go through another round of paperwork with the
FCC, explaining why it should not be fined.
-- Deborah D. McAdams
Print
Email
Thursday 12:00AM
Broadcasters File Suit Against FCC’s Political File Rules
“The FCC decision to put the political files online will bring broadcasters into the 21st century, and will make already public information more easily accessible to everyone.” Free Press Senior Policy Counsel Corie Wright.