/ 07.22.2010
FCC Defends Right to Adjust Media Ownership Rules

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski says the commission has the right to change its media ownership rules and said Congress directs the agency to review those rules periodically to determine if they need to be adjusted, eliminated or even still make sense in a changing marketplace.

The commission has asked a federal appeals court to reject arguments from media watchdog groups who oppose consolidation to reverse a 2008 decision allowing broadcast-newspaper combos in the top 20 television markets under certain circumstances. The change has not gone into effect pending court challenges.

Though the decision was made by Genachowski's predecessor Republican Kevin Martin, current General Counsel Austin Schlick filed a brief with the U.S Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia defending the agency's right to change its media ownership rules.

Genachowski, a Democrat, stated the 2008 order "was within the discretion of the commission," and the brief defends the agency's authority "to make decisions based on the information before it at the time." He said the 2010 review is underway and the FCC is required "to look at any changed facts in the marketplace based on a record which the commission is now assembling, while ensuring that our rules promote the lasting public interest goals of competition, localism, and diversity."

But Commissioner Michael Copps, also a Democrat, criticized the chairman's decision to defend the 2008 outcome.

Copps said the agency has had 18 months to reconsider the "awful" vote. "It is difficult for me to believe that our new FCC, with its new majority, is in court today basically accepting the validity of the pro-consolidation decision of a previous commission. ... The best we can do, judging from today’s brief, is to kick the media ownership can farther down the road.

"Three decades of hyper-speculation have diminished media diversity, put investigative journalism on the endangered species list and significantly dumbed-down our fact-based civic dialogue," Copps said, adding, "More often than not, the FCC aided and abetted the process."



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: James Johnson
Sun, 07-25-2010 - 9:34PM Report Comment
There should be limitations on how many stations a single entity may own. Maybe I would not support a return to 7-7-7 but I would like to see something in the range of 25-25-25 or maybe as high as 50-50-50. Three stations to a market would be nice for audio and one station (excluding LPTV) per market for TV would be nice.
2.
Posted by: Anonymous
Fri, 07-23-2010 - 10:17AM Report Comment
Bravo Mr. Copps




Wednesday 12:00AM
ESPN Rolls Out New Tech for Indy 500 Coverage
“We think onboard pictures are something that is compelling for viewers, especially in a telecast like the Indy 500"

 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology