/ 05.13.2010
CEA Head Supports Proposed Spectrum Reallocation

Consumer Electronics Association President/CEO Gary Shapiro says TV broadcasters are hogging spectrum they received for free, and it's time to use that spectrum for broadband deployment. He offered some contentious language to describe the recent lobbying by his counterparts across the Potomac at the NAB.

In an op-ed published by the Huffington Post, Shapiro — whose trade association represents wireless companies and other industries that would benefit from the FCC's broadband rollout proposals — characterizes television broadcasting as increasingly irrelevant in an Internet age, when most viewers receive their video from satellite, cable and other pay services, rather than from local TV stations.

"Broadcasting is an important part of our past and it has its niche, including new services like mobile TV being driven by innovative equipment manufacturers. But we need to focus on the future and not preserve legacy business models or government grants of monopoly," Shapiro writes.

The consumer electronics trade group leader says in response to an increasingly threatened business model, broadcasters responded by hiring "a well-connected former politician as their spokesperson," and jamming "every tried-and-true political hot button and pressure all their Beltway connections in a desperate attempt to preserve the status quo."

He continues: "As for talking points, they claim that if their entitlement is threatened, kids will be deluged with porn, national security will be imperiled and senior citizens will be abandoned," taking out of context elements discussed in the spring show opening speech by National Association of Broadcasters President/CEO Gordon Smith.

Shapiro supports the spectrum auction and sharing proposals in the broadband plan, saying, "The nation's broadcasters use only a portion of the hundreds of megahertz of high-quality spectrum that we let them use for free. Reallocating some of that spectrum for broadband services would allow over-the-air TV to continue while still solving our wireless crisis."



Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: James Johnson
Thu, 05-13-2010 - 6:27PM Report Comment
Broadcast spectrum should remain broadcast spectrum. No UHF TV spectrum should be taken away from TV. VHF TV should lose 76 to 88 MHz for a DRM digital audio broadcast band where all the little (under 5,000 nighttime) "AM" stations would move to. We have just lost several UHF TV channels with the end of the transition to digital TV and we should not lose any more UHF TV channels.
2.
Posted by: Gary Shapiro
Thu, 05-13-2010 - 6:29PM Report Comment
Thanks for the plug. Just one quibble. How is this out of context? Responding to the spectrum proposals in the FCC's National Broadband Plan, Smith suggested that allocating more spectrum for wireless broadband services would merely enable children to access pornography. "If broadcasting loses spectrum and grandma's new HDTV is rendered useless, at least she will have the consolation of knowing her grandson can get lewd material instantaneously on his cell phone," said Smith. He also suggested that proponents of spectrum reallocation would facilitate successful terrorist attacks by limiting emergency communication. "This matter is one of homeland security," added Smith.




Wednesday 12:00AM
ESPN Rolls Out New Tech for Indy 500 Coverage
“We think onboard pictures are something that is compelling for viewers, especially in a telecast like the Indy 500"

 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology