/ 10.30.2009 12:00AM
Broadcasters Want Facts About Spectrum Demands
The folks representing broadcasting in Washington would like a little more information about the FCC’s developing spectrum plan. Amid calls to reallocate broadcast spectrum for wireless broadband, the National Association of Broadcasters and the Association for Maximum Service Television filed comments late Friday on the commission’s September request for feedback on spectrum management practices.

“NAB and MSTV encouraged the FCC to consider all frequencies that may be suitable for wireless broadband, noting that frequencies above 3.7 GHz have been allocated for a variety of wireless services, including broadband applications. NAB also noted that broadcasters recently freed up more than 100 MHz of spectrum through the digital TV transition,” the NAB said in a filing notification.

The FCC’s query comprises five main areas: What can current wireless allocations handle now? What’s the ability for it to accommodate new services? What is the anticipated demand and the requirement to fulfill it? What spectrum is best suited for fixed wireless broadband? What are the key issues of reallocation with regard to public interest?

“The multi-billion dollar investments by broadcast television stations, equipment manufacturers, the government and consumers have enabled the intensive use of each television station’s 6 MHz channel to deliver a variety of high-definition and multicast programming, mobile DTV and other ancillary and supplemental services--all while freeing up more than 100 MHz of spectrum for wireless broadband and other new commercial and public safety uses,” NAB and MSTV said.

They urged the FCC to create a broadband plan that “is in harmony with the public policy goals served by existing uses of the spectrum.”


Comments
Post New Comment
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are
made, please login or register.

Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)

1.
Posted by: Anonymous
Wed, 11-04-2009 - 5:36PM Report Comment
I totally agree. The FCC has gutted the framework for broad public input and varying points of view. The loosening of restrictions regarding OWNERSHIP of multiple media outlets, just greases the skids for media corporations to grab increased market share. The internet companies are just drooling waiting for the opportunity to "acquire" more bandwidth, which has historically been free for public use. Arte Machia Arte in Motion Producers & Consultants AMTV@warwick.net
2.
Posted by: Paul Alciatore
Mon, 11-02-2009 - 12:27PM Report Comment
Why doesn't somebody report these things the way they really are. Companys that provide internet services and the equipment and the software for these services want to take spectrum away from broad stations where the public is VERY WELL served for FREE and use that spectrum for their not free services so they can make a hugh profit. That's what is gonig on. PERIOD. The public will not be served, it will only be "milked". And even the investors in those companys will not see this profit, only the big shots with their obscene salaries and bonuses. This is a grab for money, yours and mine, pure and simple and it should be reported as such.




Tuesday 12:00AM
Google Completes Motorola Mobility Acquisition
It’s a great time to be in the mobile business, and I’m confident that the team at Motorola will be creating the next generation of mobile devices that will improve lives for years to come.

 
Featured Articles
Discover TV Technology