| COMMENTS (3) | | 01/29/2010 | | Thought pieces are not necessarily what translate into policy. Benjamin's piece merely puts societal and resource allocation issues into perspective. Any disagreements are allowed and actually help shape the debate. But questioning the hiring of someone with particluar views as Congressman Walden suggests is McCarthyite and demagogic in nature the only true abomination in evidence. |
| | 12/18/2009 | | 1. Not all TV programming is vapid, as you put it. 2. For better or worse, DTV is what we have as a vehicle for local news, programs and network fare, whatever that may be. 3. Do tou really want to dismantle broadcasting as we know it and put all media on the internet or make them exclusive to cable or satellite? 4. If you favor dismantling the broadcasting infrastructure, are you in favor of paying for it with taxpayer dollars? I am not; commercial broadcasting is exactly that - commercial. We are advertiser-supported, american enterprises. Let us be. Send Benjamin back to Duke - and he can take Genachowski with him. |
| | 12/18/2009 | | Just what we need... A senator investigating a professor pointing out the widely acknowledged vapidity of broadcast programming which is contrary to the interests of the NAB's lobbyists because of "the billions recently invested in DTV". It seems clear where the motivation for his efforts comes from. |
|
|