May 1

Written by:
5/1/2009 11:59 AM  RssIcon

DeborahMcAdamsThe application of the First Amendment has come down to cuss words on TV. I wonder how that would have played out in Philly.

“What sayeth you, Mr. Franklin? Should the vulgarities that become commonplace here 220 years from now be protected under the First Amendment?”
“You’re kidding me, right?”

The First Amendment protects speech, religious freedom, the right to assemble, to petition, and the press, or what’s left of it. The protection of speech was conceptualized to preserve democracy by allowing dissent among citizens. The idea was simple--being able to disagree with political leaders while remaining attached to one’s head.

It may seem a radical notion in this day and age of simply harassing and humiliating those who disagree with the majority du jour. Yet freedom of speech is the very foundation of the American political system. It comprised the right of citizens to express an opinion, one that might be an improvement on the prevailing wisdom whether the cheeses in charge liked it or not.

Freedom of speech also keeps people from picking up pitchforks and torches and rolling out their own Scottish Maidens. That, and just enough income to keep the heat on and the fridge full. Self-determination is a very enduring human desire. Self-expression is one of its fundamental components, but not necessarily laced with obscenities.

I’m one to talk, and I know it. I’ve got a mouth on me that once made a U.S. Marine blush. That wasn’t a particularly proud moment, just lazy. I’ve read a hefty portion of Webster’s New Lexicon. Cynthia Ozick is my hero. I idolize the articulate the way many Americans worship athletes. But I grew up with rough little boys and have spent my entire working life competing in a man’s world, where, when nerve is scarce, bluster suffices.

I’ve heard and applied enough course language in a lifetime to be somewhat inured to it. That doesn’t mean I don’t find it tedious coming out of my mouth or anyone else’s. And while I truly doubt, as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia asserted this week, that children were irreparably damaged by Cher and Nicole Ritchie’s nationally televised expletives, it’s a shame the two couldn’t keep it clean for all of 45 seconds.

Now, thanks to Cher, Ms. Ritchie and a few other attention-starved celebulators, an army of lawyers is gathering to argue that filthy language is protected under the First Amendment. I wish it weren’t so.

I think of Daniel Inouye, the 84-year-old Democratic senator from Hawaii who lost an arm and won a Bronze Star, a Purple Heart and a Medal of Honor in WWII. Every few years, some junior lawmakers revive an amendment to ban burning the American flag. Everyone knows they’re grand-standing, particularly since flag fires are so commonplace as to be nearly non-existent. Sen. Inouye generally lets the posturing go on just long enough to let the cub legislators get their glory. Then he goes to the podium with his empty right suit sleeve and quietly says he detests flag burning, but the right of his fellow citizens to do so is part of what he fought for.

I doubt he intentionally walked into a German machine-gun nest so spoiled brats to cuss on television. I sincerely hope all parties involved in the broadcast indecency fight can just accept a procedural prohibition and be done with it. A legal debate about the various uses the “S-word” and the “F-word” is no way for the First Amendment to be defined, and it’s sickening slap in the face to anyone who’s gone into harm’s way.

Leave it alone already.


3 comment(s) so far...


War of Bleep Words

cYMyVA fbxwugankrvm, [url=]ehdekdofqslh[/url], [link=]bzbcctmhwphz[/link],

By fbxwugankrvm, [url=]ehdekdofqslh[/url], [link=]bzbcctmhwphz[/link]," rel="nofollow"> on   4/2/2010 5:24 PM

War of Bleep Words

I am with you 100%. When I was in school, a teacher told her class that people who chose vulgarity had a lack of vocabulary. May these people expand their horizons.

By z47tv on   6/1/2009 4:13 PM

War of Bleep Words

Deborah: I am a proud American today after seeing that there are others who believe that the Constitution was written for people who honored what it stood for. I believe we are seeing the Consitution and and the Bill of Rights being stomped on with no regard for the many many people who gave their lives for what it meant to them. It was once "life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" to thank the lord for watching over the flock and guiding us to a life that five us all the blessing of life, liberty and the pursity of happiness. Then we saw the Office of the President dishonered with people who knew what they did was wrong but decided to parse words and every young person who had no guidance from the radical agenda took on that mantra of "is" is? Now we have people who don't want to have the words God Bless America but have leaders who bow to people who hate us for who we are but like us because we have money. Back to the point, I am so happy I read this piece by you today....Thank you! Thank you!

By z47tv on   5/1/2009 4:01 PM

Your name:
Gravatar Preview
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Add Comment   Cancel 

Tuesday 03:07 PM
WMUR-TV Says FAA Drone Rules Preclude ENG
The FAA’s current rules and proposed ban on flight over people, requirement of visual line of sight and restriction on nighttime flying, effectively prohibit broadcasters from using UAS for newsgathering. ~ WMUR-TV General Manager Jeff Bartlett

Manor Marketing /   Tuesday 10:32 AM
Cobham takes on American Ninja Warrior
Sue Sillitoe, White Noise PR /   Monday 05:38 AM
DPA Microphones Takes On A Downpour at the 2015 BRIT Awards

Featured Articles
Product News
NAB 2015 Lens Preview
Discover TV Technology