Blogs
Nov 19

Written by:
11/19/2010 9:39 AM  RssIcon

The purported justification for reallocating TV spectrum for broadband is predicated in large part on anticipated growth in wireless data traffic. The latest spectrum-demand white paper from the Federal Communications Commission states that “mobile data demand is expected to grow between 25 and 50 times current levels within five years,” or between 480 and 980 percent annually.

Which leads one to wonder... who will be driving? Just about every man, woman and child over the age of six in the United States has a cell phone now, and those aged 12 to 29 use them like an appendage. Actually, 93 percent of the U.S. population subscribes to a wireless service, according to The Wireless Association. Another two percent are expected sign up over the next three years, then penetration will more or less flatten out.


So whence is the explosive demand to come? Not businesses, the assumed driver of an assumed gargantuan economic injection to come from nationally available wireless broadband. In-Stat says growth in wireless data spending by U.S. businesses is slowing. The annual growth rate is expected to decline from 5.2 percent from 2009-10, when business are expected to spend $27 billion on wireless data, to around 2.5 percent during 2013-14.


And despite the amazing ability of young women to text in their sleep, businesses pump more data through the air. Businesses accounted for around 63 percent of wireless data spending, based on the overall tally from the Telecommunications Industry Association. TIA said overall wireless data spending in 2009 reached $43 billion, thus if In-Stat’s numbers are on, businesses spent the majority.


Overall spending is projected to hit $93 billion by 2013, for an annual growth rate of 23 percent over five years, or not quite 480 to 980 percent.


Which brings us to smartphones. Smartphones generate approximately a lot more data traffic than stupid phones. The FCC’s white paper says penetration is 42 percent. Nielsen says 28 percent. Nielsen even has a line graph to prove it. But what’s a 14 percent discrepancy when you’re trying to wrench 120 MHz of spectrum out of the sticky fingers of the broadcast industry? Nay, it is but a pesky fact...


Another pesky fact is that video consumption is expected to contribute greatly to the projected increase in wireless data traffic. Because the same service for free from broadcasters does not add enough ARPU to please the investor/regulators now in charge of the spectrum.


Oh, snap!


-- from the Nov. 17 issue of
TV Technology


Tags:
Categories:

1 comment(s) so far...


Gravatar

McAdams On: Evidence to the Contrary

What's ARPU?

By on   11/22/2010 5:59 AM

Your name:
Gravatar Preview
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Your website:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 




Thursday 10:05 AM
NAB Requests Expedited Review of Spectrum Auction Lawsuit
“Broadcasters assigned to new channels following the auction could be forced to accept reductions in their coverage area and population served, with no practical remedy.” ~NAB


 
Featured Articles
Research & Standards
Transcoding Brings Order To ...
Discover TV Technology